Great Point Energy uses its proprietary catalysts to produce 13,000 to 14,000 cubic meters of natural gas per day from coal at this Des Plaines, IL, gasification pilot plant.
Great Point Energy

Business

Cheaper Natural Gas from Coal

Great Point says that its catalytic process could put coal back in your basement.

  • Tuesday, January 30, 2007
  • By Peter Fairley

In the second half of the 20th century, oil- and natural gas-burning furnaces drove coal out of the home-heating business across North America. But if Great Point Energy--a Boston-area startup with a low-cost process for converting coal into pipeline-grade natural gas--has its way, coal may start keeping us toasty again before long.

Great Point Energy of Cambridge, MA, says its process is cheaper and more reliable than drilling for new natural gas or importing liquefied natural gas from the same unstable regions. "We can take coal out of the ground and put it in a natural-gas pipeline for less than the cost of new natural-gas drilling and exploration activities," says CEO Andrew Perlman.

Advertisement

Traditional coal-to-methane plants like the 1970s-era Dakota Gasification plant in Beulah, ND, and new plants envisioned by General Electric (GE) and ConocoPhillips are costly because they require a series of chemical plants operating at a wide range of conditions. In these plants, cryogenic equipment operating just a few degrees above absolute zero feeds pure oxygen to the gasifier, where coal baked to up to 2,500 ºF breaks down into a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen called syngas. From there, the syngas is subsequently catalytically transformed into high-grade methane in a separate reactor.

In contrast, Great Point compresses the process into one single, efficient reactor by moving the catalysts into the gasifier itself. The key is a proprietary, recyclable catalyst developed in house with help from gasification and catalysis experts at Southern Illinois University, the University of Toronto, and the University of Tennessee, among others. The catalyst (which Perlman cagily describes as "a formulation of abundant low-cost metals") lowers the amount of heat required to gasify coal and simultaneously transforms the gasified coal into methane. In fact, the heat released in the syngas-to-methane step is sufficient to sustain the gasification, eliminating the need to fire up the reactions with purified oxygen. "It's perfectly heat balanced," says Perlman.

On the strength of lab-scale demonstrations with its catalyst, Perlman and his partners have picked up $37 million from venture-capital firms Draper Fisher Jurvetson, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, and Advanced Technology Ventures to test their catalyst in a pilot plant. Rather than building a pilot plant from scratch, Great Point accelerated the process by leasing one from the utility-supported Gas Technology Institute at Des Plaines, IL. Perlman says Great Point ran the plant's 14-inch-in-diameter, 60-foot-high gasifier for a week in November with the firm's proprietary catalyst, converting Illinois Powder River Basin low-sulfur coal into between 13,000 and 14,000 cubic feet of natural gas per day. He anticipates that a second run this spring will give him and his partners the data they need to take the next step: designing a larger but still precommercial plant that he expects to have operating by 2009. Subsequent testing at Des Plaines will evaluate the catalysts with dirtier yet more energetic petroleum coke, a byproduct that the average refinery generates at the rate of 5,000 to 10,000 tons per day--more than enough to fuel a commercial-scale synthetic-gas plant.

Print

Related Articles

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map

Vast amounts of the clean-burning fossil fuel have been discovered in shale deposits, setting off a gas rush. But how it will affect our energy use is still uncertain.

Cleaning Coal

Converting coal to natural gas is our best strategy for limiting carbon dioxide emissions today.

Turning Natural Gas Green

A new process extracts high-value carbon black from methane.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

protn7

72 Comments

  • 1840 Days Ago
  • 01/30/2007

Natural gas from coal

Sequester all of the CO2 from power plants to get 20 in ten.

Reply

abcarterjr

45 Comments

  • 1840 Days Ago
  • 01/30/2007

BURP

Liquidfied CO2 gas bomb underneath an oil tanker
sinks ship in a burp of bubbles when bubbles
dissipate ghost ship bobs up again??

Reply

abcarterjr

45 Comments

  • 1840 Days Ago
  • 01/30/2007

Re: BURP

Could high pressure CO2 fracture geothermal steam
well fields into a reliable source of heat?

Reply

westpower

1 Comment

  • 1838 Days Ago
  • 02/01/2007

Not buying it

I knew guys working with exxon on this 20 years ago and they thought it was a doe boondoggle then.  They still think it is now. They couldn't get it to work, so how are these 28 year old kids from the software industry going to do it? sorry, not buying it.

Reply

bbindlepete

1 Comment

  • 1787 Days Ago
  • 03/24/2007

Re: Not buying it

The field of catalytic chemistry has changed sincee the days of Exxon Donor Solvent. Have you kept up with the photocatalytic conversions? Sunlight and water to hydrogen and oxygen. A nice neat split. Close the loop with a fuel cell and off to tomorrow.

Be well  

Reply

kiewolf

1 Comment

  • 1759 Days Ago
  • 04/21/2007

Re: Not buying it

I would guess that these 28 year old kids, much like Bill Gates did, have the technical imagination and scientific intellect to design just what they did.  If all engineers, scientists, and entrepenuers thought as you do, we would all still be riding horses and using the out house.

Reply

jabailo

6 Comments

  • 1703 Days Ago
  • 06/16/2007

Re: Not buying it


Why is the Technology Review so obsessed with "Bill Gates"?   He never invented anything.

Reply

Advertisement

cretin001

35 Comments

  • 1605 Days Ago
  • 09/22/2007

Re: Not buying it

i was wondering about that too...

Reply

cool12

1 Comment

  • 590 Days Ago
  • 07/03/2010

Re: Not buying it

Sunshine, do you realize this plant has been producing syngas,phenols and seven other chemicals for over 25 years. In 1996 we added an anhydrous line and CO2 line.  Comments welcome

Reply

walt

66 Comments

  • 1834 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2007

geography

These guys a big-time operators:  they have moved the Powder River Basin from Wyoming to Illinois.

Reply

mnlbison

1 Comment

  • 1641 Days Ago
  • 08/17/2007

Comment

The technology was developed in the 1930's by the Germans as an alternative to oil, then further advanced by South Africa during the embargoes on that country. World GTL (gas-to-liquid) does the same thing with natural gas and a different catalyst in what is basically a methanol plant. GE is in a joint venture building many coal-to-diesel plants in China, so the technology is not pie-in-the-sky.

Reply

ecpioneer

1 Comment

  • 1340 Days Ago
  • 06/13/2008

This plus Algae Growing solves the problem

The producers of natural gas from coal yield carbon dioxide. C02 is gold to Algae growers. We are ready to setup an Algae growing factory using our local pig farm manure and C02 in photobioreactors. We need the natural gas from coal and shale and convert cars to compressed natural gas for about 2000 usd. These 2 ideas alone could solve our energy problems. Where is our USA government leaders on this? We can easily have $2 a gallon fuel forever. Vote for me as president and this is how I will do it.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Consumer-Driven Disruptions

More

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Netflix

Ushahidi

Square

Zynga

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement