Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 3 Next »

Monday, January 22, 2007

Battery Breakthrough?

A Texas company says it can make a new ultracapacitor power system to replace the electrochemical batteries in everything from cars to laptops.

By Tyler Hamilton

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
The ZENN car will be the first commercial application of EEStor's new energy storage system. The company is expecting delivery of the systems later this year.
Credit: ZENN Cars

A secretive Texas startup developing what some are calling a "game changing" energy-storage technology broke its silence this week. It announced that it has reached two production milestones and is on track to ship systems this year for use in electric vehicles.

EEStor's ambitious goal, according to patent documents, is to "replace the electrochemical battery" in almost every application, from hybrid-electric and pure-electric vehicles to laptop computers to utility-scale electricity storage.

The company boldly claims that its system, a kind of battery-ultracapacitor hybrid based on barium-titanate powders, will dramatically outperform the best lithium-ion batteries on the market in terms of energy density, price, charge time, and safety. Pound for pound, it will also pack 10 times the punch of lead-acid batteries at half the cost and without the need for toxic materials or chemicals, according to the company.

The implications are enormous and, for many, unbelievable. Such a breakthrough has the potential to radically transform a transportation sector already flirting with an electric renaissance, improve the performance of intermittent energy sources such as wind and sun, and increase the efficiency and stability of power grids--all while fulfilling an oil-addicted America's quest for energy security.

The breakthrough could also pose a threat to next-generation lithium-ion makers such as Watertown, MA-based A123Systems, which is working on a plug-in hybrid storage system for General Motors, and Reno, NV-based Altair Nanotechnologies, a supplier to all-electric vehicle maker Phoenix Motorcars.

"I get a little skeptical when somebody thinks they've got a silver bullet for every application, because that's just not consistent with reality," says Andrew Burke, an expert on energy systems for transportation at University of California at Davis.

That said, Burke hopes to be proved wrong. "If [the] technology turns out to be better than I think, that doesn't make me sad: it makes me happy."

Richard Weir, EEStor's cofounder and chief executive, says he would prefer to keep a low profile and let the results of his company's innovation speak for themselves. "We're well on our way to doing everything we said," Weir told Technology Review in a rare interview. He has also worked as an electrical engineer at computing giant IBM and at Michigan-based automotive-systems leader TRW.

Much like capacitors, ultracapacitors store energy in an electrical field between two closely spaced conductors, or plates. When voltage is applied, an electric charge builds up on each plate.

Ultracapacitors have many advantages over traditional electrochemical batteries. Unlike batteries, "ultracaps" can completely absorb and release a charge at high rates and in a virtually endless cycle with little degradation.

Where they're weak, however, is with energy storage. Compared with lithium-ion batteries, high-end ultracapacitors on the market today store 25 times less energy per pound.

This is why ultracapacitors, with their ability to release quick jolts of electricity and to absorb this energy just as fast, are ideal today as a complement to batteries or fuel cells in electric-drive vehicles. The power burst that ultracaps provide can assist with stop-start acceleration, and the energy is more efficiently recaptured through regenerative braking--an area in which ultracap maker Maxwell Technologies has seen significant results.

[1] 2 3 Next »

Comments

  • EEStor hype
    Emosson on 01/22/2007 at 12:50 AM
    Posts:
    2
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Unfortunately EEStor never made and will never make the supercapacitor described in the patent

    http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT7033406&id=cjx3AAAAEBAJ&printsec=abstract&zoom=4&dq=eestor#PPA3,M1)

    because they ignore a well known physical effect, called “dielectric saturation”.

    Barium titanate has been used in capacitors for decades, due to its high dielectric constant:

    http://www.avxcorp.com/docs/techinfo/mlcmat.pdf

    However, the dielectric constant drops as the electric field strength increases:

    http://www.nap.edu/books/NI000488/html/49.html
    http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v71/i12/p890_1

    At a hypothetical field of 3500 Volts over a thickness of 12.76 micrometers, as proposed in the patent, the dielectric constant of barium titanate would be orders of magnitude lower than the claimed 18500, reducing capacity and energy density by the same factor…

    This has been discussed in more detail by Prof. Anatoly Moskalev on December 24th and 26th, 2006 in
    http://www.teslamotors.com/blog1/index.php?p=43

    with an update on January 20th, 2007:
    http://www.teslamotors.com/blog1/?p=46
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: EEStor hype
      theBike45 on 01/22/2007 at 6:58 AM
      Posts:
      13
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
        Well, on the one hand we have some professor claiming that some theory prevents EEStor from acomplishing what it says. On the other hand we have a real company apparently making real devices that apparently work as designed. I'll believe the guys actually working on the devices first, until they fail to produce what they say they they will. Theories and laws generally follow innovations to explain what happened.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: EEStor hype
        hamid on 01/23/2007 at 3:17 PM
        Posts:
        10
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        AFAIK, EEStor has not built a capacitor with the characteristics required for an EV (3500 volt field with high capacity as claimed).  They seem to only have produced the powder, but not a capacitor that can be subjected to the high field strengths.

        Can you provide a link to "apparently making real devices that apparently work as designed."?

        thanks
        Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: EEStor hype
        run on 01/26/2007 at 10:53 PM
        Posts:
        7
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
        Having read your words on more then one day I want to emphasize them:

        Theory is theory.  It's never perfect, never what it says it is is.  F NEVER EQUALED MA.  The 'other' one might not be the best we can do either, but EVEN IF IT IS, it's NOT reality.  It's just talk.  Those who have to have things proven have faith in fantasy to begin with.

        Theory to accomplish things, not to discourage innovation.  Not to spare brain cells.  Smart people don't need 'principles' to understand what they closely observe.  The brain has a nack at combining observations and phenonemon so often much better when not confused by generalities and analogy.  But we differ widely in our ability to do that and no amount of silver spooned or coaching makes much of a difference despite so much progress in didactic theory. 

        Those who teach need them.  Those who don't need to teach don't. 
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: EEStor hype
          johnsawyercjs on 02/11/2007 at 4:20 PM
          Posts:
          2
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
          run, that's an interesting collection of confusing, self-canceling platitudes, which could mean you're either trying to emphasize the benefits of theory, or the benefits of practical implementation, but we have no real way of telling from your post.  "Those who have to have things proven have faith in fantasy to begin with"--what is that supposed to mean?
          Rate this comment: 12345
          • Re: EEStor hype
            Elroch on 03/22/2007 at 6:17 AM
            Posts:
            28
            Avg Rating:
            4/5
            F does equal MA
            with an accuracy adequate for almost all purposes.

            Even quantum mechanics and general relativity merely produced new laws which make very small corrections to Newton except under at very high speed, very small scales or extremely powerful gravitational fields.
            Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: EEStor hype
      CJC_PE on 01/22/2007 at 9:36 AM
      Posts:
      13
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      The EEStor patent indicates that the ceramic material that they are using is a doped barium-titanate covered by US patent 6078494 assigned to U.S. Phillips Corp. That patent claims that the material has a capacitance with a low voltage dependence. The patent does not quantify the voltage dependence. The accelerated life test was performed at 1800 V/mm. The EEStor patent indicates the selected ceramic formulation has a dielectric constant of 33500 before further modification.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: EEStor hype
      wizwom on 01/22/2007 at 4:44 PM
      Posts:
      6
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      The patent that I am sure they are using is 7144655, which is a hybrid DLC/LiIon Cell.  That is, the charge is held partially in a chemical cell, and partly in a dielectric-separation.  As I understand it, the charging cycle is a quick capacitance sequence, which then naturally trickles the charge to the Integrated Cell.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: EEStor hype
      silvertrailer on 01/24/2007 at 2:24 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Break-through technologies only seem that way to non tech types,
      Technology evolves. For example every aspect of the apple iphone has been around for quite some time.   So this ultracapacitor is hype like the anti-gravity Segway...remember that.   I'd be happy to get ultracapacitors to run 4 LED lights : A project I have been working on for a decade.  Since the storage of energy with Ucap's is macro molecular you aren't gonna get the energy density to power a motor but as motor starters well that been done since the invention of the electric motor and could use improvement in hardware, software and aplication finesse
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: EEStor hype
        run on 01/26/2007 at 10:38 PM
        Posts:
        7
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
        what's the point of your project?  For a grand you can buy a thousand LED flash controllers right now.  Most camcorders still use incandescent though for VIDEO!  MOST DVD players, and an incredible fraction of current models, can't handle standardardised common formats or anything other then pressed discs.

        Brush motors are for Kirby vacum cleaner types.  A bike one just failed to get a quarter grand on ebay.  Almost all energy products seem to be coming out of an anticompetetive market be they what most people use.

        The fact is that the 'phone' you speak of will suck at being used as a phone in comparison with what mobile phone users enjoyed a decade or two ago.  SNL made fun of it on battery life.  It will drop calls when plugged into the grid.  It might sell some wireless routers "turning air into gold"; it will further destroy the conversations of those it infects.
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: EEStor hype
      CapacitorMan on 01/31/2007 at 2:13 PM
      Posts:
      23
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      Good point. As someone who has worked in this field for decades, there are several areas that have been overlooked, in addition to the dielectric saturation:
      1. The first, and greatest is the temperature coefficient on these kind of dielectrics, it drops 80% at the high temperature end,
      2. The voltage stress will be 3 times what is typically allowed.
      3. The failure mode for these types of capacitors is shorting, and that energy, if real, would release the equivalent of 100 sticks of dynamite.
      4. To make the capacitor using low cost electrodes means firing in reducing atmospheres, which this type BT can't take
      5. They cannot get the characteristics they claim with one micron grain size.
      6. They ignore the law of mixtures-when they mix the two glasses, they will drop the K dramatically.

      Just for fun, check out the "freedom car" initiative...the contributing universities and companies are not dummies. They rule BT dielectrics out mainly because of the energy possible, and the lack of a "benign failure mode".

      I wonder what they will accomplish with the next $2 million they are about to get. For the first set of funding, they came up with pure Barium Nitrate. Imaging what a good graduate program could do with that funding.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: EEStor hype
        kalexander on 02/26/2007 at 7:03 PM
        Posts:
        2
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
        Grad program?
        How many idiot PhDs would that produced, compared to competent ones?
        That's like saying state planning works better than free enterprise.
        Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: EEStor hype
        DabRetroper on 09/09/2007 at 4:23 PM
        Posts:
        2
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
        All technological knowledge and prowess aside, I am struck by how quickly those who consider themselves "in the know" rush to discredit or shout "impossible" at an idea simply because they have been unable to do it themselves.

        EEStor has thus far been quite secretive, presumably because they do not want their work duplicated, but admittedly possibly because the whole thing is bunk.

        However, without the benefit of the knowledge of what their solutions are to the problems so many of you bring up here, it is both asinine and inerudite to use words like "never," "cannot," "impossible," or "hype." The information simply doesn't exist to draw these conclusions.

        I'd expect better argumentative logic from a group of people allegedly so learned. How many great discoveries led to things we use on a daily basis that take advantage of an elegant solution to a problem that was "impossible" to solve? Let's be honest; most of you are immensely concerned that your own education and intellect are insufficient to solve the problem you see before you, which might well have been solved by someone else.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: EEStor hype
          CapacitorMan on 10/24/2007 at 5:01 PM
          Posts:
          23
          Avg Rating:
          4/5
          I understand your point that we should not be a bunch of "nay-sayers". But what would you have those of us familiar with the technology do? Shut up and let the dreamers have a field day with no testing?

          This is not a new formulation, it is virtually identical to commercially available materials that behave very differently from the claims, just as others have said. The most recent patent is the third formulation that EEStor has come up with and claimed astounding properties. Do you wonder what happened to the first two?
          Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: EEStor hype
          electronicsman on 06/15/2008 at 8:36 PM
          Posts:
          2
          Avg Rating:
          4/5
          Caps have been around for a long time. Improvements came a long way. The one farad, the ten farad and so on came with new materials while theory still the same. When I graduated in 1973 with a graduate degree I thought I knew it all. It took many years after that for my development. Theory is just that, it does not conflict with inventions or new ideas. Degrees sometimes get in the way, but they are (if they are remmembered) helpful to explain things. Many times simple ideas can take the state of the art a long leap forward. Ideas should be explainable unless they are secret to protect the hard work and the amount of dollars spent to perfect them. To have an idea, prototype it, improve it, and get it to market is something professors, Ph.D.'s never got into it. It is hardwork, loving what you do, investigation, reading, looking up others work, and so on until a viable product is out meeting minimum specifications. 
          Rate this comment: 12345
          • Re: EEStor hype
            electronicsman on 06/15/2008 at 9:40 PM
            Posts:
            2
            Avg Rating:
            4/5
            We are discussing the new cap and the validity of claims made by EEStor. Some are trying to get EEStor to prove it, while others based on known physics rejecting it. The global view of this is to look at the application and where would fit an save humanity a lot of grief. Improvements come in small doses most of the time and if you hit the jackpot once in a life time it becomes unbelievable and most poeple are skeptical. Oher factors may play a major roll. For example, the Prius, a hybrid car been around for a while, until gas prices skyrocketted, it did not have that much share of the market, actually it left Detroit in the dust or it rendered all gas guzlers obsolete. The idea of combining gas, gearbox, electric motor/generator, battery technology together, a system, turnkey product. You may argue today one component, it may replace the battery in the Prius or other application. At the end it is the economics, the convenience and the acceptance by the user what is going to make the difference.
            Rate this comment: 12345
    • What I can Buy Today
      jiggys on 04/17/2007 at 9:09 PM
      Posts:
      3
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      Today I can buy a 3000F,2.7V ultracapacitor from Maxwell with an energy density of 5-6 WH/kg. This is a mass produced product with extensive sales. JEOL in Japan says they have an improved nanocarbon ultracapacitor with an energy density of 50-75 WH/kg but I believe this still under development.
         The EESTOR patent claims 31F at 3500V in 336 lbs of about 342 Wh/kg but looks to be a long way from production, probably 3-5 years judging from the time EESTOR's competitors took.
         I personally think the 3500V is a red herring since a lower voltage at a bigger capacitance is more usefull for running motors etc and avoids additional weight of voltage conversion equipment.
         By the time EESTOR gets up to speed these other companies will probably be there too.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: What I can Buy Today
        CJC_PE on 04/18/2007 at 9:48 AM
        Posts:
        13
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        The higher voltage is the key to the EEStor approach to obtaining high energy density. Energy stored in a capacitor is proportional to the square of the charge voltage. Given two capacitors of the same capacitance value with one charged to one thousand times the voltage of the other, the one charged to the higher voltage contains one million times as much energy as the one charged to the lower voltage.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: What I can Buy Today
          jiggys on 04/20/2007 at 12:58 AM
          Posts:
          3
          Avg Rating:
          5/5
            What counts is how much energy is stored. This is not necessarily a function of V squared, since we dont know how capacitance varies with voltage.
            EESTOR's 31F at 3500V capacitor energy is the same as one with 3100F at 350V.
            Based on some of the other comments on this board I think they will find 3500V is a tough nut to crack, and that a larger capacitance, lower voltage system is easier to develope.
          Rate this comment: 12345
          • Re: What I can Buy Today
            CJC_PE on 04/20/2007 at 3:58 PM
            Posts:
            13
            Avg Rating:
            4/5
            The voltage rating may indeed turn out to be a tough nut to crack along with preventing the high voltage from reducing the relative permittivity. However, that is what EEStor has evidently selected as their target. The ceramic dielectric itself and the ways they are modifying the dielectric are components that are best suited to developing high voltage capability in a small package as opposed to developing high capacitance value.
            Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: EEStor hype
      kellybundy on 11/12/2007 at 11:29 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      "All truth goes through three stages: first it is ridiculed, then it is violently opposed: Finally it is accepted as self evident." - Schopenhauer ...

      “Until lions have their historians, tales of the hunt shall always glorify the hunter.”

      -- African Proverb

      “It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.”

      -- Aristotle

      -- Arthur Ashe

      “The man who follows the crowd will usually get no further than the crowd. The man who walks alone is likely to find himself in places no one has ever been.”

      -- Alan Ashley-Pitt

      “The greatest pleasure in life is doing what people say you cannot do.”

      -- Walter Bagehot



      Question: “If you could live forever, would you and why?”
      Answer: “I would not live forever, because we should not live forever, because if we were supposed to live forever, then we would live forever, but we cannot live forever, which is why I would not live forever.”
      (for you smart ones...this is a non-sequiter) good to laugh when ripping each other up.
      -- Miss Alabama in the 1994 Miss Universe contest
      for more quotes and musing see: 
      Genius Hall of Vindication
      or the Mainstream Science
      Hall of Shame
      http://www.megafoundation.org/Genius/GeniusHall.html#j20

      The Plight of the Obscure Innovator in Science
      http://www.nih.gov/about/director/ebiomed/history1.htm
      and
      Hans Alfven - Plasma Physics

      Svante Arrhenius - Ion Chemistry

      J. L. Baird - Television 

      Robert Bakker - Warm-blooded dinosaurs

      Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar - Black Holes 

      Ernst Chladni - meteorites in 1800

      Doppler - optical Doppler effect

      Galileo - Heliocentric view

      Evariste Galois - Group Theory

      Luigi Galvani - bioelectricity

      Karl F. Gauss - nonEuclidean geometry

      Binning/Roher/Gimzewski - scanning-tunneling microscope

      Robert Goddard - rocket-powered space ships

      Goethe - Land color theory

      Thomas Gold - deep non-biological petroleum deposits; deep mine bacteria

      William Harvey - circulation of blood, 1628

      Hans Krebs - ATP energy, Krebs cycle

      J Lister - sterilizing

      Margulis, Lynn - endosymbiotic organelles

      Mayer, Julius R. - The Law of Conservation of Energy
      Marshall, B - ulcers caused by bacteria, helicobacter pylori

      McClintlock, Barbara - mobile genetic elements, "jumping genes", transposons

      Newlands, J. - pre-Mendeleev periodic table)

      Nottebohm, F. - neurogenesis: brains can grow neurons

      Ohm, George S.  - Ohm's Law

      Ovshinsky, Stanford R. - amorphous semiconductor devices

      Pasteur, Louis - germ theory of disease

      Rous, Peyton - viruses cause cancer

      Semmelweis, I. - surgical cleanliness, puerperal fever

      F. Sherwood Rowland - Carboflourocarbons destroy ozone

      William James Sidis - Prodigy

      Nikola Tesla - Earth electrical resonance, "Schumann" resonance, brushless AC motor

      Warren S. Warren - MRI anomololies

      Alfred Wegener - Continental drift

      Wilbur & Orville Wright - Flying machines

      George Zweig - Quark Theory

      When a true genius appears in this world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.
      — Jonathan Swift

      Some ridiculed ideas which had no supporters:

      Ball lightning - lacking a theory, it was long dismissed as retinal afterimages

      Catastrophism - ridicule of rapid Earth changes, asteroid mass extinctions

      Child abuse - before 1950, doctors were mystified by "spontaneous" childhood bruising

      Cooperation or altruism between animals - versus Evolution's required competition

      Instantaneous meteor noises - evidence rejected because sound should be delayed by distance

      Mind-body connection - psychoneuroimmunology, doctors ridiculed psychological basis for disease

      Perceptrons - later vindicated as Neural Networks

      Permanent magnet levitation - "Levitron" shouldn't have worked

       

      The study of history is a powerful antidote to contemporary arrogance. It is humbling to discover how many of our glib assumptions, which seem to us novel and plausible, have been tested before, not once but many times and in innumerable guises; and discovered to be, at great human cost, wholly false.
      — Paul Johnson

      Links
      Neglected Pioneers: Herapath, Waterson
      Physics: forgotten history

      Concepts which have proved useful for ordering things easily assume so great an authority over us, that we forget their terrestrial origin and accept them as unalterable facts. They then become labeled as "conceptual necessities", etc. The road of scientific progress is frequently blocked for long periods by such errors.
      — Albert Einstein

      Books
      Fatal Attractions: The Troubles with Science - H. Bauer
      At the Fringes of Science - M. Friedlander
      Great Feuds in Science - H. Hellman
      Great Feuds in Medicine - H. Hellman
      Hidden Histories of Science - R. Silvers (ed.)
      ...the Myth of the Scientific Method - H. Bauer

       

      All great truths began as blasphemies.
      — George Bernard Shaw

      Hans Alfven - Plasma Physics

      The idea of parallel electric fields was proposed over 50 years ago by Nobel laureate, Hans Alfven of Sweden. Although ridiculed at the time as electric fields directed this way were believed to "short out" when oriented along the highly conducting magnetic field lines, observations gathered in space, such as those from the FAST satellite, as well as recent theoretical advances, have clearly shown that such processes produce the aurora and may indeed be widespread in nature. [Source: UC Berkely]

       



      Svante Arrhenius - Ion Chemistry

      His idea that electrolytes are full of charged atoms was considered crazy. The atomic theory was new at the time, and everyone "knew" that atoms were indivisible (and hence they could not "lose" or "gain" any electric charge.) Because of his heretical idea, he only received his university degree by a very narrow margin. The value of Arrhenius' work was not well understood because the idea of a connection between electricity and chemical affinity, once advocated by Berzelius, had vanished from the general consciousness of scientists in his university at Uppsalla but attention from a couple of established scientists in Stockholm helped him to get recognition for his work. Arrhenius was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1903.

       



      John Logie Baird - Television camera

      When the first television system was demonstrated to the Royal Society (British scientists,) they scoffed and ridiculed it. His work a crucial break-through in television technology. Today, 95% of modern TV is pre-recorded, an approach recommended by Baird. A large amount of contemporary TV utilizes the film scanning system of Rank-Cintel, which absorbed Baird's Cinema Television. Baird's single electronic gun CRT development work in 1945 was eventually followed in the design of the Sony Trinitron tube. In a manner that today seems commonplace, his initial mechanical solution was quickly supplanted by newer technology, but his inventive work continued and his legacy continues. Baird succeeded in perfecting visual transmission systems others had long abandoned. His single-minded tenacity proves that most obstacles are no greater than the limits of the imagination. [...]

       



      Robert Bakker - Fast, warm-blooded dinosaurs

      Robert T. Bakker is far and wide paleontology's greatest and most well known character. You probably know Bakker as the man who hypothesized that dinosaurs may have been warmblooded, or the scientist who believed that diseases caused the demise of the terrible lizards, or the author who wrote the book the Dinosaur Heresies. But, there is much more to the career of Dr. Robert Bakker. [...]

       



      Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar - Black holes

      Chandrasekhar presented on white dwarfs and their size limits at the Royal Astronomical Society in January 1935, but the most famous astronomer at that time, Arthur Eddington, ridiculed his ideas. Chandra went to several famous physicists and asked them to check his calculations. All of them agreed that there was no mistake, but it still took decades before the Chandrasekhar Limit was accepted by all astrophysicists. Eventually his idea became the foundation for the theory of black holes.

      Because he didn't find acceptance by astronomers in England, and political fighting and favoritism blocked his chances for a good job in India, Chandra came to the United States.  Eventually, Eddington admitted that Chandra's theory was right, and they made peace. Forty years after he first announced his theory, Chandra was awarded the 1983 Nobel Prize in physics.

       



      Ernst Chladni - Meteorites 

      Ernst Florens Friedrich Chladni was a Russian of German origin who was a member of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences.  In 1794 he published a book in which he argued that meteorites were in fact rocks that had fallen from the sky.  He came to that conclusion after comparing the Krasnojarsk pallasite and an iron found in Otumpa between Paraguay and Argentina.  He noted their exotic make up.  He also pointed out that not only was the metal in the two rocks identical, there were no rocks even remotely near where they were found that were similar.  He correctly stated that they had in fact fallen from the sky due to the effects of earth’s gravity and further that these rocks formed fireballs when they passed through the atmosphere. This work was not well received by the leading scientists of the day because at the time meteorites were believed to be “thunder stones” formed in storms by earth rocks being sucked up in a vacuum and being struck by lightning.  Another reason was that most meteorites were stones and not irons.  Almost to mock his critics on December 13, 1795 under a clear blue sky a 25 kilo meterorite fell on Wold Cottage in Yorkshire.  Analysis of this stone found iron that matched the iron in the meteorites discussed in Chladni’s book.   

       



      C.J. Doppler - Doppler effect

      Proposed a theory of the optical Doppler Effect in 1842, but was bitterly opposed for two decades because it did not fit with the accepted physics of the time (the Ether theory.) He was finally proven right in 1868 when W. Huggins observed red shifts and blue shifts in stellar spectra. Unfortunately this was fifteen years after he had died.

       



      Galileo Galilei - Heliocentric Universe (Copernican viewpoint)

      Galileo’s ideas about the universe at the beginning of the Scientific Revolution were first dismissed as being impossible. Upon review, however, the priests and aristocrats feared the worldview that Galileo’s universe was beginning to force upon them. Galileo was placed under house arrest until the end of his life, he received a formal apology from the Catholic Church only in the past decade, hundreds of years after his death. [The Galileo Project]





      Evariste Galois - Mathematics Prodigy; Group Theory

      Galois's terse style, uncompromising personality and the sheer originality of his ideas contributed to the delay in the publication of his papers and failure to get appropriate recognition for his work. There was also a certain amount of bad luck. One manuscript was lost when the reviewer died. Throughout his short life his mathematical insights were poorly understood. He was killed in a duel when he was just 21. Galois' brother and his friend Chevalier copied his math papers and sent them to mathematicians including Gauss and Jacobi. Galois had wished that Gauss and Jacobi would review his work, but no record of any comments exists. The mathematician Liouville did review his work and announced to the Academy that he had found in Galois' papers a concise solution

      ...as correct as it is deep of this lovely problem: Given an irreducible equation of prime degree, decide whether or not it is soluble by radicals.

      He published Galois' papers in his journal in 1846. The theory that Galois outlined in these papers is now called Galois theory.

       



      Luigi Galvani - bioelectricity

      Galvani's experiments were ridiculed because they countered established views. According to Galvani, "They call me the frogs' dance instructor." His innovative experiments helped to establish the basis for the biological study of neurophysiology. The paradigm shifted from the view of Descartes and his contemporaries. Nerves were not water pipes or channels, as had been thought, but electrical conductors. Information within the nervous system was carried by electricity generated directly by the organic tissue.

       



      William Harvey - circulation of blood

      He annouced his discovery that blood circulated around the body in 1616 causing the scientific community of the time to ostracize him. He had challenged Galen's view, popular for 1400 years, that blood was continually being made and used up. Harvey's theory was  met with much resistance because by implication it threw doubt on the value of blood letting, a very popular treatment of the day. 




      Sir Hans Adolf Krebs - ATP energy, Krebs cycle

      Krebs displayed great flexibility in following surprising results. A humble and occasionally sardonic man, Krebs suggested to a meeting of the American Philosophical Society in 1970 that the way to impress upon governments the value of scientific exploration would be to do away with the vast amount of wasteful and gratuitous research he described as ”occupation therapy for the university staff.” Krebs received the 1953 Nobel Prize in Physiology.




      Karl F. Gauss - nonEuclidean geometery

      Kept secret his discovery of non-Euclidean geometry for thirty years because of fear of ridicule. Lobachevsky later published similar work and WAS ridiculed. After Gauss' death his work was finally published, but even then it took decades for Noneuclidean Geometery to win acceptance among the professionals.



      Binning/Roher/Gimzewski - Scanning-tunneling microscope

      Invented in 1982, surface scientists refused to believe that atom-scale resolution was possible, and demonstrations of the STM in 1985 were still met by hostility, shouts, and laughter from the specialists in the microscopy field. It's discoverers won the Nobel prize in 1986, which went far in forcing an unusually rapid change in the attitude of colleagues.




      R. Goddard - Rocket-powered space ships

      Goddard first obtained public notoriety in 1907 when he fired a powder rocket in the basement of the physics building at WPI. School officials then took an immediate interest in Goddard's work and, to their credit, did not expel him for the incident. In this 1920 publication, Goddard outlined the possibility of a rocket reaching the moon and exploding a load of flash powder on its surface to mark the rocket's arrival. The bulk of his scientific report to the Smithsonian was a dry explanation of how he used the $5000 grant in his research. The press picked up Goddard' s proposal about a rocket flight to the moon and sparked a journalistic controversy concerning the feasibility of such a concept. Goddard was widely ridiculed, causing him to deeply resent the press corps, a view that he held for the rest of his life.




      Goethe - Land color theory






      T. Gold - Deep non-biological petroleum deposits; deep mine microbes






      J. Lister - Sterilizing






      Lynn Margulis - Endosymbiotic organelles

      In 1970 Margulis was not only denied funding but subjected to intense scorn by reviewers at the NSF. "I was flatly turned down," Margulis said, and the grants officers added "that I should never apply again." Textbooks today quote her discovery as a plausible theory; that plant and animal cells are really communities of cooperating bacteria.




      Julius R. Mayer - The Law of Conservation of Energy

      Mayer's original paper was contemptuously rejected by the leading physics journals of the time.




      B. Marshall - ulcers caused by bacteria, helicobacter pylori

      Stomach ulcers are caused by acid. All physicians knew this. Marshall needed about ?? years to convince the medical establishment to change their beliefs and accept that ulcers are a bacterial disease.




      B. McClintlock - Mobile genetic elements, "jumping genes", transposons




      J. Newlands - pre-Mendeleev periodic table




      George S. Ohm - Ohm's Law

      Ohm's initial publication was met with ridicule and dismissal. His work was called "a tissue of naked fantasy." Approx. ten years passed before scientists began to recognize its great importance.




      Fernando Nottebohm - Regenerating neurons

      After twenty years as a ridiculed minority, Nottebohm's work with songbird brains was finally taken seriously, and the biologists of today now recognize that the age-old dogma was wrong: brains DO regenerate neurons after all.




      Louis Pasteur - Germ theory of disease




      Stanford R. Ovshinsky - amorphous semiconductor devices

      Physicists "knew" that chips and transistors could only be made of expensive slices of single-crystal silicon. Ovshinsky's breakthrough invention of glasslike semiconductors was attacked by physicists and then ignored for more than a decade. Ovshinsky was bankrupt and destitute when finally the Japanese took interest and funded his work. The result: the new science of amorphous semiconductor physics, as well as inexpensive thin-film semiconductor technology (in particular the amorphous solar cell, photocopier components, and writeable CDROMS sold by Sharp Inc. and other Japanese companies.)




      Ignaz Semmelweis - Surgical cleanliness, puerperal fever

      Semmelweis intuits that germs are leading to infections and death in surgical settings. He studies the phenomena and makes dramatic improvements in patient care that save thousands of lives. Instead of accolades, he is seen as bringing criticism on the medical establishment. He is demoted and ridiculed. In 1865 he suffers a mental breakdown and is committed to a mental institution. There, at age 47, he cuts his finger. Ironically, he dies of puerperal fever a few days later.




      Nikola Tesla - Earth electrical resonance, now called "Schumann" resonance; brushless AC motor

      An AC motor which lacks brushes was thought to be an instance of a Perpetual Motion Machine.




      Peyton Rous - Viral cause of cancer




      F. Sherwood Rowland - Danger of Chlorofluorocarbons

      first warned that chemicals called cholorofluorocarbons, or CFCs, were destroying the ozone layer. They were ridiculed for their work for years before being vindicated by the discovery of a massive hole in the ozone layer over Antarctic. Rowland, along with Mario Molina and Paul Crutzen, won a Nobel Prize in 1995 for their work.

       



      William James Sidis - Prodigy

      Accomplished prodigy that was widely regarded as a dysfunctional failure because he collected subway transfers. Sidis published a number of thought-provoking and scholarly works and, in spite of myths to the contrary, seems to have been well-adjusted.

       



      Warren S. Warren - Anomolies in MRI theory

      Warren and his team at Princeton tracked down a Magnetic Resonance anomaly and found a new facet to MRI theory: spin interactions between distant molecules, including deterministic Chaos effects. Colleagues knew he was wrong, and warned him that his crazy results were endangering his career. Princeton held a "roast", a mean-spirited bogus presentation mocking his work. Warren then began encountering funding cancellations. After approx. seven years, the tide of ridicule turned and Warren was vindicated. His discoveries are even leading to new MRI techniques. See: SCIENCE NEWS, Jan 20 2001, V159 N3, "Spin Control".



      Alfred Wegener - Continental drift




      Wilbur and Orville Wright - Flying machines

      After their Kitty Hawk success, The Wrights flew their machine in open fields next to a busy rail line in Dayton Ohio for almost an entire year. American authorities refused to come to the demos, and Scientific American Magazine published stories about "The Lying Brothers." Even the local Dayton newspapers never sent a reporter (but they did complain about all the letters they were receiving from local "crazies" who reported the many flights.) Finally the Wrights packed up and moved to Europe, where they caused an overnight sensation and sold aircraft contracts to France, Germany, Britain, etc.



      George Zweig - Quark theory

      Zweig published quark theory at CERN in 1964 (calling them 'aces'), but everyone knows that no particle can have 1/3 electric charge. Rather than receiving recognition, he encountered stiff barriers and was accused of being a charlatan.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: EEStor hype
      ingocar on 11/18/2007 at 3:23 PM
      Posts:
      2
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      Looks like they would be using doped barium-titanate, specifics unknownt to me. In any case, yuo are entitle not to invest in the company of course, even to feel jelous if they turn out to be right. But what I find obscene is tu acuse them of dishonestly so blumtly in public. They may be wrong and they may fail, but you are telling us that they are asking for money knowing they will fail because the wel known facts you point out.
      You wrote here as you are the smart one, the only one who knows, and that thee cann't even read. You will grow older, eventually.
      Rate this comment: 12345