Driving Impulse Shopping with a Smart CartSupermarkets could soon turn to monitoring technology to make us buy more stuff.
Radio frequency identification (RFID) technology may not only be useful for streamlining inventory and supply chains: it could also make shoppers swarm. A new study suggests that supermarkets could increase their revenues by using information gleaned from RFID tags to make shoppers behave like an impulse-buying collective.
Impulse buying currently accounts for about 40 percent of all supermarket purchases, says Ronaldo Menezes, an expert in swarm intelligence at the Florida Institute of Technology, in Melbourne, FL. But his research suggests that impulse buying could be significantly increased if information was fed back to shoppers about what others are buying. It's an established fact that consumers are more influenced by other people's purchasing decisions than they are by discounts, says Menezes. Furthermore, it's well-known that people will flock or swarm in certain conditions, such as when a fire alarm goes off. The idea here was to exploit both of these inclinations in order to create a swarm of impulse shoppers. The introduction of so-called smart shopping carts should make this possible. Already being used experimentally by a number of supermarkets, these carts are capable of knowing what a customer has put in them by scanning the contents for an RFID tag: a sort of wireless bar code that is being introduced in products. And some carts, such as the Shopping Buddy, developed by Cuesol, in Quincy, MA, have touch screens. So by monitoring the contents of everyone's carts, the screens could possibly feed information back to customers as they shop. For example, a customer entering a particular aisle may be informed, via the cart's screen, that 60 percent of customers currently have a specific product from that aisle in their cart. Similarly, when the customer places an item in the cart, he or she may be notified about other products purchased by customers who bought this one. Amazon and iTunes use similar tactics online, notes Herb Sorensen, CEO of the in-store consumer-research organization Sorensen Associates, in Troutdale, OR. He thinks the tactic will make sense in the physical world, as well. Sorensen Associates already uses RFID-enabled smart carts to conduct similar research on shopping behavior. (These carts, however, do not feature the screens that display information about other customers' purchases.) So far Menezes has only carried out simulations of this swarming behavior, so it remains to be seen if the same behavior manifests in real shopping scenarios. "We are confident that our preferences are as close as you could get to a real consumer," he says. |
Tracking a Shopper's Habits
08/04/2008










Comments
joe
11/02/2006
Posts:1
Given that this is on-going research I'd prefer not to openly
share models at this point.
ronaldomenez...
11/03/2006
Posts:5
Lying is a well-established marketing technique.
ms
11/02/2006
Posts:130
ethics of sales models. You can probably raise issues
related to ethics in most things you see in supermarkets: shelf positioning, layout of the store.
The reseach was an exercise on Swarm Intelligence. Similar things
have been used in online stores. The retail case we studied
has physical limitations that online stores don't have.
ronaldomenez...
11/03/2006
Posts:5
aisha
11/03/2006
Posts:1
"planned items" are not affected too much by impulse shopping.
ronaldomenez...
11/03/2006
Posts:5
for example brand A bought by 33% customers and Brand B by 10% etc
zusmani
11/04/2006
Posts:1
But manipulating me to make impulse purchases? And yes, my first thought also was, all they have to do then is lie about what's being sold - and what are you gonna do? Complain? To whom? I'm not going to go to the store manager and tell her I find her system offensive because I suspect it's lying to me. She will just nod and silently accuse me of being a grumpy old fart, which of course I am. Meanwhile she will smugly note the swarms of women dashing to and fro through the store as new items are being "sold" to other customers in Aisle 2, and Aisle 5, and then Aisle 6, and then Aisle 3, etc. I will then note that the trampled bodies should be cleared from Aisle 27, but I'm sure by then she will be ignoring me completely.
I'm the sort of person who will resent that to a degree that science has not the instrumentation to measure. My reaction will be to shop elsewhere, or if that is not convenient, to put wet paper towels over the "smart screen" where I find the information intrusive and/or unnecessary, or if that is not convenient then I will probably accidentally drop a sharp object(s) on the screen until it stops bothering me. Get it?
CatoTheElder...
11/03/2006
Posts:1
stops being amuzing and becomes plain silly. :)
The problem of impulse shopping is *not* with the stores but with the customers. If people could control themselves they would not be affected by this kind of technology. Customers need to be aware that everything they do has an effect in their lives. Yesterday, a study came out in the UK showing that each citizen appears in a camera (surveilance) as many as 300 times a day (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3225985/).
So you are being watched get used to it! Supermarkets
are not going to to be the exception to the case.
Retails stores are *currently* using various tactics to make you
buy more. What is the difference now? Is there anyone who actually believe that a 40% discount in a store is really 40%? Or that the store is *only* making 160% profit on that product?
Our study has no privacy issues that don't exist already. The swarming idea is anonymous. We don't need to know what *you* are buying but everyone is buying.
ronaldomenez...
11/03/2006
Posts:5
it for all the posts due to lack of time.
I encourage anyone with spefic questions to contact us directly.
ronaldomenez...
11/03/2006
Posts:5
gabrielg01
11/05/2006
Posts:402
Harold C
01/16/2009
Posts:2