Business

A Cleaner, Cheaper Route to Titanium

An MIT startup is hoping to make titanium much more affordable. The benefit: lighter, more fuel-efficient planes.

  • Wednesday, June 7, 2006
  • By Neil Savage

Titanium is as strong as steel, but weighs only about 60 percent as much. It's also highly resistant to corrosion, and handles temperature extremes well. So, not surprisingly, the aerospace industry wants to use much more of it in the next generation of planes, making them lighter and reducing fuel costs.

But there's a hitch: at around $40 per pound today, titanium is expensive -- and the price keeps going up.

Now a startup, Avanti Metal, using technology developed at MIT, hopes to commercialize a process that drastically reduces the cost of producing titanium, making more of it available for large, lighter-weight airplanes. The process, developed by MIT chemist Donald Sadoway, applies an environmentally benign, direct electrolysis method to make the metal.

Titanium is naturally abundant. But processing titanium oxide found in the ground to make a usable metal is slow and produces toxic waste. "The price of titanium has gone through the roof," says Corby Anderson, director of the Center for Advanced Mineral and Metallurgical Processing at the University of Montana. "It's double what it was this time last year -- and last year it was pretty high."

Advertisement

Jeffrey Sabados, president of the four-person Avanti, estimates that, based on production plans published by Boeing and Airbus, there'll be a 30,000-ton shortage of titanium by 2010. He claims that Avanti's process for refining titanium could slash costs to about $3 per pound. Then, if the metal then sells for even $25 per pound, an estimate he calls conservative, it's a huge potential profit.

Since the early 1950s, titanium has been produced through the Kroll process. Manufacturers first make titanium chloride, which gets processed into titanium tetrachloride, and then mixed with magnesium, which draws out the titanium and produces chlorine gas. The result is a porous material, contaminated with magnesium salts, which requires further processing to remove the salts and make it usable for manufacturing. The process is so toxic that it's difficult to get the permits needed to build a new plant in order to expand production.

Sadoway says their process is much greener. They mix titanium oxide with other oxides, such as magnesium oxide or calcium oxide; then they heat the mixture to about 1,700 degrees Celsius. This produces a bath of molten oxides, through which an electric current can be run. The electricity produces electrolysis, breaking the bond between the titanium and oxygen atoms, and the heavier titanium sinks. The result is a pool of liquid titanium at the bottom and oxygen bubbling out the top. The other molten oxides remain in place, acting as the electrolyte when more titanium oxide is added. "You just keep making more and more and more metal," Sadoway says.

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (Hal Ade)

  • 2077 Days Ago
  • 06/07/2006

Read British Titanium's Site re Electrolysis

Did your titanium researchers take a look at this site?

  http://www.britishtitanium.co.uk/loader.html


British Titanium is a company formed to exploit the FCC titanium electrolytic production process, invented in 1997. Bti has had their pilot plant going very successfully.
From reading their above web-site, it seems their electrolysis process is much simpler than MIT's, and uses less energy.

I would strongly urge that you read their site before you come to any conclusions as to which is the most cost-effective process. It may
be MIT's, but it may also be Bti's, or yet another's.

Sincerely,


Hal Ade
Gatineau, QC.

Reply

Guest (richard)

  • 2076 Days Ago
  • 06/08/2006

metalysis

see also www.metalysis.com, which has the real technology behind British Titanium's claims.

Reply

Guest (Martin G. Smith)

  • 2075 Days Ago
  • 06/09/2006

Metalysis

As I suggested in my comment on the Solar suggestion after checking out the Metalysis site, if the technology can be exploited on a localized level, let’s do it. With this I add my now well known lines:
Each day as we walk the byways and flash along the highways of light,
there are those who are left standing, as the march to flight
goes by some to stop and wonder at the enormous potential at what
has been created.
But others who are left, standing in a rut at the side of the road,
a rut too soon to become an abyss.

So Then? What to do?

Have said before, too many times to count, yet shall say again, as often as need be,
until there is clarity in the air:

The time has come to put a fence at the top of the cliff, instead of a net at the bottom:
Thus giving a chance to build a bridge over the abyss.


http://abota.blogsource.com

Reply

Guest (Mark Shapiro)

  • 2077 Days Ago
  • 06/07/2006

cleaner smelting with solar?

The need for heat and  electricity makes titanium smelting a great candidate for solar power.  Concentrating, non-imaging reflectors can produce temps up to 6,000 degrees C, well above the 1,700 degrees needed for titanium, with enough left to generatee electricity for the electrolysis step.  Added benefit:  intermittency is not an issue.   Just make titanium while the sun shines.

Reply

Guest (George Wilcox)

  • 2077 Days Ago
  • 06/07/2006

titanium Production is a 24/7 proposition

Solar is not viable for titanium production because it's a 24/7 proposition - to do otherwise is to loose efficiency and a whole lot of energy wasted cooling off and restarting when the sun goes behind a cloud or sets.  Non-base load dependent applications are better suited to solar.

Reply

Guest (Dr. OAL)

  • 2040 Days Ago
  • 07/14/2006

Cooment to Titanium Production is a 24/7 ...

Keep in mind that combined with batteries, you can charge the batteries with excess electricity at daylight (sunlight  passes through clouds, too!), and use the batteries at night to run the electrolysis. In order to run an electrolysis like this with a molten electrolyte at elevated temperature, you have to run it continously. However, I hope there are better ways to get your electricity!

Reply

Guest (bob)

  • 2077 Days Ago
  • 06/07/2006

but what about consistancy?

how well would you acctualy be able to controle that tempreture?

would you be able to keep it from changing to much. im not meatlurgy expert but i would thing that having a heat level that constantly is changing might ruin the overall purity of the product metal

Reply

Advertisement

Guest (Martin G. Smith)

  • 2077 Days Ago
  • 06/07/2006

cleaner smelting with solar

Mark makes a good point. How’s this for an image, a group of solar smelters on a Black Sand beach ably tended by a group of itinerant surfers who cut the melt between sets. On a serious note however, the solar notion makes possible the rendering of Titanium in marginal circumstances possible. Hey Fab Lab folk, are you listening. This is an area I would like to explore if anyone is interested.

Reply

Guest (Dr. OAL)

  • 2040 Days Ago
  • 07/14/2006

Titanium ssmelting with solar heat

This is not possible technically nor economically!

Reply

Guest (Martin G. Smith)

  • 2011 Days Ago
  • 08/12/2006

This is not possible technically nor economically!

Tell that to the Paul Sherrer Institue [http://solar.web.psi.ch/data/facilities/?tasc], They just did it!!
Did Somebody forget to tell you, 'Not Possible' is no longer in use.

Reply

Guest (Guy Zaczek)

  • 2071 Days Ago
  • 06/13/2006

The Best Solution

I live in Niagara Falls so guess what type of power I am going to suggest.  If you use Hydro to make the titanium using chemical plants already here in Western New York that produce lighter transport vehicles, that save millions of dollars in Petro you have a win, win solution without the problems of wind.

Reply

Guest (Martin G. Smith)

  • 2070 Days Ago
  • 06/14/2006

A solution, The Best??

While there is plenty of power in New York, I haven’t found any Rutile there. I suggest a better alternative is to take the processor to the mineral [http://www.mindat.org/min-3486.html] and use solar energy [http://solar.web.psi.ch/data/facilities/?mcdd] for the processing. The reality is if you look at where the base mineral is located in the world there is economy to be gained by processing on site, returning the ‘slag’ to the site for reclamation, then shipping the base metal for further processing in existing plants. I contend a Solar processing facility could be built into three [3] 40’ shipping containers, a whole lot more functional than moving massive amounts of raw materials with all the infrastructure this involves.
martin@redseven.ca

Reply

martyn newby

1 Comment

  • 1980 Days Ago
  • 09/12/2006

Titanium

A very small kiwi company (Titanox Ltd) has been making low oxygen (<0.5%) TiAl and Ti3Al powder for several years.  The process uses high energy milling  of TiO2 (any phase) with aluminium (no purity requirement) and subsequent thermal reduction and hydrometallurgical separation.  They have even gone on to demonstrate the production of pure titanium metal.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Consumer-Driven Disruptions

More

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

American Superconductor

BrightSource Energy

Novomer

Twitter

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement