Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

The End of NASA Science

Large and small science projects have been delayed or canceled as NASA reallocates funds to manned space flight.

By Kate Greene

Thursday, March 16, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

When President Bush unveiled his proposed budget last month, it was clear that the winners at NASA were the Space Shuttle program and International Space Station (ISS), and the losers were science missions. Now it's becoming clear just how bad those losses are. In the view of many experts, the most historically successful NASA efforts -- telescopes, space probes, and research into everything from climate change to aviation safety -- are taking the worst hits.

Within the past month, several NASA missions have been cancelled or delayed due to the constraints of the proposed 2007 budget. Funding for small research projects and data analysis will be slashed; astrobiology will be cut by 50 percent; astronomy and astrophysics will lose 20 percent of its funds over the next five years; and money for aeronautics research will be cut by 18 percent.

Most shocking to many scientists was the cancellation of a mission to send a probe to study Europa, one of Jupiter's moons. The National Academy of Sciences and NASA advisory committees deemed exploring Europa to be a high priority, after Mars exploration, because the moon's icy surface is believed to hide oceans with the potential for life. "We were told in October that we would have money," says Fran Bagenal, and astrophysicist at the University of Colorado. "A lot of people have been working on the Europa mission for a decade. It's a huge disappointment."

The cancellation of the Europa mission is even more frustrating for scientists in light of recent images from the Cassini spacecraft's mission to Enceladus, a moon of Saturn, says Louis Friedman, executive director of The Planetary Society. "Just last week we had the Enceladus finding, where a fantastic water spout was coming out of that moon," which indicated the possibility of life, he says. "There's something profound there. But all you have to do is project 10 years out and this isn't going to be happening."

And two telescope missions have been cancelled. One is the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) -- a telescope that has been already fully installed in a 747 Boeing aircraft. SOFIA would have studied the universe in the infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, a part of the spectrum invisible to optical telescopes such as Hubble. Events such as galaxy formation can be detected in the infrared. The first test flights were scheduled for this year.

A second telescope project, called the Terrestrial Planet Finder, would have studied the formation of planets beyond our solar system. Many of these planets have been discovered in the past few years, fueling hopes that life may exist elsewhere, too. The mission had not yet been approved, but preliminary development had begun.

Comments

  • Wastefull spending
    We are spending more than that in just two to three months in Iraq.  I think our priorities are quite mixed up.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (TN)
    03/16/2006
    Posts:1
  • The first A in NASA's name
    Thanks for the article "The End of NASA Science." I agree completely, but I note this unfortunate fact too: the article nearly completely shares the national media's near-blindness to NASA's enormous array of aeronautical research capabilities, which are also being devastated by the "Vision for Space Exploration." We have a semi-dystopia in air travel now, but we also have imaginative, able aeronautical research engineers in NASA. Yet we refer to our National AERONAUTICS and Space Administration as merely the "space agency" rather than as what it actually is, or I guess now I should say, was: the aerospace agency. Will travel change as much in this century as in the last? If so, will this country's aeronautical research establishment contribute? For the second question, the signs aren't good. Thanks.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Steven T. Corneliussen)
    03/16/2006
    Posts:1
    • Barbarians at the helm
      This current government is truly a government of barbarians. They know nothing, and understand nothing, and listen to no-one ecept their own ideological cohorts. From Iraq, to global warming, to Katrina, to basic science to a grossly appalling military budget to you name it, they have f***ed things up in a big way. It will take years to fix their mistakes and the public and the media just slumbers on
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (srinivas)
      03/16/2006
      Posts:1
    • erik.a.zahn@boeing.com
      I completely agree.  It's gotten very bad with NASA in respect to Aeronautics.  I have come to the firm belief that NASA needs to be broken up back into NACA and NSC.  At least then they wouldn't be able to cannibalize the budget so easily and it would show that the "emperor has no clothes" with respect to aeronautics in the US.  Maybe it's time to move to Europe, they seem to care quite a bit about Aeronautics. 
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Erik)
      03/17/2006
      Posts:1
  • It is so short sighted...
    This is not the first time that budgets for research missions have had to be cut.  There is nothing to be gained at this time from sending a manned misson to Mars, except of course to stand barrel chested and say "We've put a man on Mars!" And?

    We still don't know why there has been such a high failure rate on other missions to Mars.

    The question that needs to be answered is... "Who stands to gain the most from sending men to Mars?"

    The answer... "Commercial ventures and big business"

    Conclusion... "Motivate those who stand to gain the most to 'invest' in manned missions.

    The same people would also gain from investing in research to beef up those coffers as well.

    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Daniel R. Franco)
    03/17/2006
    Posts:1
  • Christian Talibans
    This administration behaves like the Talibans. A bunch of religious fundamentalists imposing their primitive, medieval values. They put that guy without a college degree as the NASA PR Chief. He went around removing the word "evolution" in all NASA publications, and he also tried to muzzle NASA scientists speaking out about global warming. Can you imagine a college drop out telling world experts what to say publicly about their own science? This administration is insane.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Gabe)
    03/17/2006
    Posts:1

Resources

Events

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.