Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement

May 2002

The Invention Factory

Continued from page 1

By Evan I. Schwartz

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Fourth Era of Invention

If anyone can bring the Invention Factory to life, it ought to be Myhrvold. His training and experience extend to so many fields that he is as comfortable brainstorming with software designers or nuclear scientists as he is kibitzing with French chefs or science fiction authors. Talking about obstacles in just about any area of technology gets him energized; the pace of his speech quickens and he breaks out into roiling laughter at the slightest provocation.

Myhrvold, 42, joined Microsoft in 1986 after undergraduate and graduate training in mathematics, economics and physics, not to mention postdoctoral work under Stephen Hawking at the University of Cambridge in England and a brief tenure as the president of his own software startup, which was acquired by Microsoft. His subsequent appointment as Microsoft's chief technology officer gave him license to explore dozens of high-tech domains, from interactive television to speech recognition, and in 1991 he convinced the company to start Microsoft Research, which has grown into one of the largest corporate research labs launched in the past half-century.

Yet even the ability to pursue almost any software-related research project wasn't enough to absorb all of Myhrvold's wide-ranging attention. During his final years at Microsoft he began delving into paleontology and other exotic fields, even taking leaves to go digging for dinosaur bones. In fact, the fossil of an ancient reptile now hangs on his office wall, while the Intellectual Ventures lobby is adorned with the head of a dinosaur model used in one of the Jurassic Park films and a small museum's worth of obsolete gadgets, like a solar-powered telegraph and a giant slide rule for high-precision calculations.

After leaving Microsoft in 2000 with an estimated $650 million in company stock, Myhrvold had the freedom to think seriously about the conditions that foster invention. He and Jung are founding the Invention Factory on the strength of his theory that the American economy is entering its "fourth stage" of innovation, a time when the long-dominant corporate labs are losing their edge and the truly world-changing inventions may once again come from inventors working alone or in small groups, as they did in the 19th century.

The first stage of innovation, Myhrvold says, was a golden era sparked by 1830s patent law changes that made the process of reviewing and granting patents much more rigorous. This reduced the likelihood that more than one patent would be granted on the same basic idea, making each patent much more valuable, and encouraging a parade of great lone inventors from Samuel Morse and George Westinghouse to Alexander Graham Bell and Thomas Edison. The parade continued into the early part of the 20th century with inventors like the Wright brothers, Bakelite creator Leo Baekeland, Polaroid founder Edwin H. Land and television pioneer Philo T. Farnsworth.

But by that time Myhrvold's second stage, the era of corporate-controlled innovation, was already under way. At the turn of the century, companies such as General Electric, DuPont and AT&T began hiring scientists and engineers by the hundreds in an attempt to come up with more breakthroughs before outsiders could disrupt their monopolies. These companies' labs kept the rights to new inventions to themselves, blanketed their fields with filings and overpowered the lone inventors with legal assaults. By the 1920s, corporations moved to gain a majority share of U.S. patents for the first time (see "Lone Inventors Lag Behind").

This system ultimately produced the transistor and launched the microelectronics and computing industries, but by the 1970s, Myhrvold notes, economic pressures were putting the squeeze on corporate research-and-development budgets. Many corporate labs dating from the early or mid-20th century have now been struggling for years. Often, maintains Myhrvold, the surviving corporate research labs became demoralizing work environments, places where "potentially great inventors are treated as mid-level engineers."

Entrepreneurs seized the mantle from the corporate labs beginning in the late 1970s, when the PC era commenced. This transformation, Myhrvold's third stage of innovation, gave rise to the Silicon Valley model, in which leading university researchers, students and corporate rebels obtain massive infusions of private venture capital to fund what Myhrvold describes as largely development work and marketing efforts. But with the bursting of the dot-com bubble in the spring of 2000, this model too has suffered a decline. "The Silicon Valley model has been fantastic," Myhrvold says, "but it's been stretched to the limit. We've had a lot of talented people with a lot of money pursuing dumb ideas."

Brainstorming for a better model, Myhrvold is setting out to launch the fourth stage of innovation. This new era, he says, has two distinct characteristics never seen before. First, there is still plenty of financing available for truly great ideas. Second, individual inventors are armed with an unprecedented array of information tools-such as powerful computers that can create 3-D simulations of new products and test their functions-that weren't available even at the corporate labs or the startups of the past. As a result, Myhrvold believes, independent inventors reminiscent of the heroes of the first stage can rise to ascendancy once again. Yet if these inventors focus purely on creation, they'll need assistance and an infrastructure to support them-which is what the Invention Factory is all about. Says Myhrvold, "We think the time is ripe for organized lone inventing to come back."

Lone Inventors Lag Behind
Independent inventors once earned most U.S. patents. But since the 1920s, loners have been outgunned by corporate, government and university labs, which often keep the rights to their employees' inventions.

May 2002

Would you like to read more articles from the May 2002 issue?

This article is from the May 2002 Issue of Technology Review. To read other articles from this issue simply register for My.TechnologyReview.com. It's free.

Subscribe today and save up to 41% »

Comments

  • Ronald J. Riley speaks
    Guest (Marcus Anderson) on 04/01/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    The comment above by Ronald Riley explains why he, and most small inventors, never get anywhere with their inventions. "Inventors have big egos, and I'm no exception," says Riley. "I know inventors who are flat out incapable of working with other people."

    At least Mr. Riley is being honest when he says he's an egotist. My question is, how does Mr. Riley expect to work with patent lawyers, marketing specialists and possible icensees if he and other small inventors can't get along with anyone? Another question I have is, "why would anyone get a patent in the first palce if they can't work with other people who could help them market it?"

    After reading Ronald Riley's comments, I agree with him that he has a tremendous ego problem. But with this kind of self grandizement, along comes paranoia, fear and greed. Maybe that's why most small inventors fail. Maybe that's why Mr. Riley will always fail too.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Ronald Riley - Inventor ED
      Guest (Arnold Van Kemp) on 06/06/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      I agree with your comments about Ronald Riley. He has a very high opinion of himself, but he seems to have nothing to show for it. I have not seen any proof of his expertise in licensing patents or earning royalties for inventors. He certainly believes that he is an expert on patent matters, but where's the proof? After reading his articles, I'm not convinced that he's had any success in this field, even though he wants others to believe otherwise. The most disturbing part of his "work" comes in the form of many "sux.com" websites that would cause any rational person to question Ronald J. Riley's credibility. No one has to be an egotist to be successful. Being proud to be an egotist is Mr. Ronald Riley's downfall and one day he will receive back what is coming to him.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Found: Ronald Riley Central
        Guest (Willow Buchanan) on 06/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        I found this compilation of Ronald Riley's blog comments that explains his views on inventions and patents:
        http://ronaldjriley.blogspot.com/
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Ronald J. Riley "the patent expert"
      Capalist1 on 12/24/2007 at 11:54 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Ronald J Riley is a nutcase. He posted literally thousands of hate-filled accusations against American Express, including these comments:

      "I was implying that the Amex family was inbreeding."

      “If I am in the mood for a bit of fun I stick the phone between my legs and pass gas.”

      “I have the ear of tens of thousands of people in the inventor community.”

      "I have been kicking the tar out of NWA for about eight years and they have been totally powerless to stop me. I estimate that the negative PR has cost NWA millions of dollars.""Is it true that American Express has a breeding program where they are crossbreeding their most obnoxious and ignorant staff to produce a superior race of Amex shills?"

      "I am willing to bet that all three of them can't figure out when they need to wipe unless head stooge tells them."

      "I believe that this is their form of foreplay, and that they are getting ready to mate. I surmise that they are planning to produce genetically tailored offspring for American Express."

      “The top dogs are most full of dodo and as the dodo spreads out each successively lower tier gets covered.” “To be blunt, I make my living by eating CEO's lunches. I am very good at it.”

      “The way you conduct yourself comes across as a young male with raging hormones. Either that or you have one of the worse cases of thingy envy I have ever seen in a women. “

      "I am a credentialed investigative journalist." This is a SMALL sample of what this idiot posted.

      To see it all first-hand, just look on www.amexsux.com.

      There is a search function available.Here's the kicker....someone found out that his claim against American Express was completely bogus!
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Paranoia, Egos, & Inventors
    rjriley5000 on 10/23/2006 at 8:30 AM
    Posts:
    2
    1) There is a delicate balance between exercising an appropriate degree of caution and taking steps to protect one’s interests and being too paranoid.  Most certainly I have known inventors who were unable to succeed do to paranoia.  Conversely, those who did not recognize that producing an invention of value will draw the attention of patent pirates generally get blind sided and fail.  There is a balance which leads to success while being too trusting or being excessively distrustful clearly leads to failure.

    2) Ego is not unique to inventors.  All one has to do is spend some time lobbying government or working with entrepreneurs to recognize that ego abounds.  The lesson is that it takes incredible determination to succeed in any high stakes venture and ego plays a big role in such success.  Ego can also be the cause of failure.  Once again it is balance which determines if ego helps or hinders.

    Ronald J Riley,
    President - Professional Inventors Alliance - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR"at"PIAUSA.org
    Exec. Dir. - InventorEd, Inc. - www.InventorEd.org - RJR"at"InvEd.org   

    Change "at" to @
    RJR Direct # (202) 318-1595 
    Generally available 9 AM to 9 PM EST
    May be availabe plus or minus two hours.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology