|
Thursday, March 09, 2006 Cheap Hydrogen FuelGE says its new machine could make the hydrogen economy affordable, by slashing the cost of water-splitting technology. By David Talbot
Among the many daunting challenges to replacing fossil fuels with hydrogen is how to make hydrogen cheaply in ways that don't pollute the environment. Splitting water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen using electricity from energy sources such as wind turbines is one possibility -- but it's still far too expensive to be widely practical. Now researchers at GE say they've come up with a prototype version of an easy-to-manufacture apparatus that they believe could lead to a commercial machine able to produce hydrogen via electrolysis for about $3 per kilogram -- a quantity roughly comparable to a gallon of gasoline -- down from today's $8 per kilogram. That could make it economically practical for future fuel-cell vehicles that run on hydrogen. Electrolyzers are fairly simple technologies: water is mixed with potassium hydroxide electrolyte and made to flow past a stack of electrodes. Electricity causes the water molecules to split into hydrogen and oxygen gases, which bubble out of the solution. The chemistry makes a good high-school science experiment -- but commercial-scale quantities of hydrogen are extracted far more cheaply from natural gas. The core problem in improving electrolyzers for hydrogen manufacture is not how to improve the fundamental conversion efficiency, says Richard Bourgeois, an electrolysis project leader at GE Global Research in Niskayuna, NY. "You can only make it so much more efficient; there isn't a lot you can do. So we've attacked the capital costs," he says. Today's electrolyzers are made of metal plates bolted together manually, with gaskets between them, and the whole unit is typically housed in a chamber made of the same metals used in the electrodes, says Bourgeois. The materials are expensive and assembly requires costly labor. Bourgeois' research team came up with a way to make future electrolyzers largely out of plastic. They used a GE plastic called Noryl that is extremely resistant to the highly alkaline potassium hydroxide. And because the plastic is easy to form and join, manufacturing an electrolyzer is relatively cheap. Inside the plastic housing, metal electrodes still do the same job. But because GE is using less electrode material, the reactivity of the electrodes' surfaces is improved. To do this, the researchers borrowed a spray-coating process -- normally used to apply coatings for parts on jet engines -- to coat the electrodes with a proprietary nickel-based catalyst with a large surface area.
|
Cheap Hydrogen
01/31/2008


Comments
Guest (Paul Holister) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Gary Beach) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (MurMac) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
http://www.crd.ge.com/04_media/news/20041117_hydrogen.shtml
Guest (Neil Brosnahan) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (B. K. Richard) on 03/11/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Ron Wagner) on 03/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
We need congressional leadership to help make this happen asap. Unfortunately it will probably happen in Japan first.
All the best,
Ron Wagner
dukieh on 03/08/2008 at 11:54 AM
1
Guest (Peter Jacobs) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
For instance 1 kg H2 gives 143 KJ heat of combustion (I will ignore the fact that a fuel cell does not "combust" to do PV work like and car engine.)
1 kg gasoline gives ~ 45 KJ heat of combustion.
Some better ways to make a comparison might be.
What is the capital cost of the electrolyzer in $/Watt?
What is the efficiency of the electrolyzer in (Joules/Joule)?
Guest (Ian) on 03/12/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Orin Laney) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Fred Stone) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Peter) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Ted) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Rick) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Vladimir Tikal) on 05/21/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
texaskycizek on 09/10/2006 at 10:35 PM
1
Guest (Rick) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Rick) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Rick) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
http://tinyurl.com/qpgjz
Guest (MurMac) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Steve Koelzer) on 03/11/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
chuckg on 10/25/2006 at 2:33 PM
1
Chuck
Guest (RAJA) on 03/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Blake) on 03/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (michael) on 03/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (KPerry) on 05/18/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Juan Hernandez) on 06/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
sircorp on 08/21/2006 at 1:57 AM
1
amitabh123 on 10/04/2006 at 3:45 AM
1
Thank you.
afiarafiq on 04/07/2007 at 8:48 AM
10
wim on 08/20/2007 at 8:22 AM
1
What will be working temperature?
fracasbtech on 07/02/2008 at 11:27 AM
1
While the technology is new, I feel and think that I must ask why the cost of hydrogen fuel sale is comparable to premium fuel
<http://articles.directorym.net/Cheap_Hydrogen_Fuel_Los_Angeles_CA-r868701-Los_Angeles_CA.html>.
Wasn’t part of the plan to begin finding cheaper and environmentally cleaner ways to fuel our vehicles? Is the expensive cost really doing us any good as drivers? Any future predictions? Thank you!
DKMcCann on 07/26/2008 at 10:04 AM
1
Thanks, Dennis