Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

MIT on the Seine?

The EC is proposing a European Institute of Technology, but many are giving the ambitious idea a failing grade.

By Peter Fairley

Wednesday, March 1, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

José Manuel Barroso, president of the European Commission (EC), delivered a tough message to his constituents last month: Europe's universities -- even its Oxfords and Sorbonnes -- lack the critical mass required to compete with leading universities in the United States. To accelerate the region's innovation engine, Barroso proposed a European university with true star power, dubbed the European Institute of Technology (EIT).

When the European Union heads of state meet later this month in Brussels they will consider this controversial proposal to shake up Europe's universities. The idea of an EIT first appeared on the EC's agenda in February 2005, when Barroso floated it as one solution to a perceived "innovation gap" between Europe and the United States. As proof, he noted that Europe's share of global patents and Nobel Prize winners was dropping. Worse still, claimed the EC, Europe was less effective at translating its shrinking number of innovations into commercial results.

The EC pins much of the blame on Europe's universities. It argues that the EU's system for research and higher education is just too fragmented. According to the commission, nearly 2,000 universities in the region aspire to be active in research. Compounding the problem, they say, is relatively weak spending on education and R&D in Europe, compared with the United States.

To solve the problem, the EIT would recruit Europe's best scientists to form interdisciplinary research and teaching networks around issues or themes, such as wind power, avian influenza, and sustainable transportation. Perhaps more important, though, would be the forging of closer ties with businesses, both to access private funding and to accelerate commercialization of its advances.

The EIT proposal has received mixed reviews, though. A few governments have already offered their support. France has promised 300 million euros -- if the EIT's headquarters are established in Paris -- while others, notably, the United Kingdom, advocate strengthening existing universities instead.

Universities are similarly divided. The proposal has led to an uproar from the European Universities Association in Brussels, which fears that the EIT would further dilute EU research budgets. Some universities, however, welcome the EIT, as an endorsement of their own efforts to put technology transfer on an equal footing with research and teaching.

A survey of U.K. and U.S. innovation released last month by the Cambridge-MIT Institute suggests that EC president Barroso may have oversimplified Europe's dilemma, however. Alan Hughes, Director of the University of Cambridge's Centre for Business Research, says it may be the ability of European businesses to integrate innovative research that needs more attention.

Comments

  • MIT in Europe
    Having owned and operated companies in Belgium, the UK and the USA and having worked in Spain France and Germany, the missing point in all the above articles is language. I have had great assistance from universities in all of the above countries but have always had to make the first move. This is difficult if the language is not your own. If Europe does intend to set up a world class institution of this type, to attract the kind of people needed it will have to use English as a working language, which excludes France.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (David Matthews)
    03/01/2006
    Posts:1
    • European MIT idea
      1. MIT itself wasn’t founded by bureaucratic fiat, nor were most US  colleges. They started from people’s local desires to further  their education, and many were later granted State support. We still have many private schools that started that way, and the collaboration of schools and business arose in due course without a Federal Mandate to do it.
      Europeans seldom started things from the ground up; they were dependent on a Royal (or Church) blessing from on high. Because of that history the admittedly neat idea of an EIT will not likely be as efficient nor as innovative as the process here in the US.
      I expect the French will scream bloody murder if it goes to someplace like Barcelona, Tübingen or Edinburgh, and move to scuttle it, while Bratislava, Krakow and Vilnius will wonder why it isn’t coming their way. Stay tuned for the fight.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (TheTonster)
      03/02/2006
      Posts:1

Resources

Events

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Prescription: Networking
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.