Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Stem-Cell Revolution

Biologist Doug Melton talks about how disease-specific stem cells will reshape medicine.

By Emily Singer

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Scientists at Harvard University recently announced a much anticipated milestone in regenerative medicine: the creation of stem cells from patients with a variety of diseases. The cells, which can be encouraged to develop into cell types damaged by disease, such as the insulin-producing cells in diabetes or neurons in Parkinson's, are poised to give scientists an unprecedented view of disease.

Medical Milestone: Doug Melton, co-director of the Harvard Stem Cell Institute, says that distributing induced pluripotent stem cells to researchers around the world will advance the study of degenerative diseases like Parkinson’s and diabetes.
Credit: B. D. Colen/ADIOL

Scientists have hoped to create such cells for more than a decade, initially attempting the feat through human cloning. But cloning proved more challenging than expected, and it wasn't until the introduction of a novel technique, developed recently in Japan, that they succeeded. By exposing a patient's skin cells to four genetic factors found in the developing embryo, scientists can turn back the clock, triggering the cells to look and behave like embryonic stem cells. Known as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS), they eliminate the need for human eggs or the creation or destruction of embryos, thus bypassing major ethical and technical hurdles that have plagued the field of embryonic stem-cell research.

The scientists who created the cells at the Harvard Stem Cell Institute, including George Daley and Kevin Eggan, now plan to distribute them to colleagues around the world. Doug Melton, codirector of the institute and a longtime champion of stem-cell research, talks with Technology Review about the future of the field.

Technology Review: Why are disease-specific cell lines so important?

Doug Melton: If a patient has Parkinson's disease, their dopamine-producing cells are gone. We don't understand anything about what makes those cells go away--the field is kind of stuck because you can't watch the progression of the disease.

Stem cells can make neurons in a dish. Imagine you have iPS cells from a healthy person and from a Parkinson's patient. If you make dopamine neurons from both sets of cells in separate dishes, you can look at what went wrong with the diseased stem cell. The same approach will work with different degenerative diseases, such as diabetes or ALS [amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a motor-neuron disease].

Story continues below

TR: How long will it take to get insight into these diseases?

DM: For ALS, Kevin Eggan published a paper on mice showing he could see a defect in cell survival in motor neurons [made from cells derived from an animal model of the disease]. He is now looking for that defect in human cells. The next step would be to determine if that defect is the same in all patients.

Comments

  • embryonic stem cells obsolete?
    "induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS), they eliminate the need for human eggs or the creation or destruction of embryos"

    Eliminate? No. Not true. An alternative in some research situations only.

    www(dot)livescience(dot)com/health/071127-bad-stem-cells(dot)html

    "A big mistake now would be to consider human embryonic stem cells obsolete," wrote Holm Zaehres and Hans Scholer of Germany's Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine. "Embryonic stem cell research is more important than ever"

    "
    Rate this comment: 12345

    freejack_rx@...
    08/27/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: embryonic stem cells obsolete?
      Yeah, I would agree with you.
      There are many applications where these will be just as useful, but they are pluripotent and not totipotent.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      b4b2
      08/27/2008
      Posts:9
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
    • Re: embryonic stem cells obsolete?
      The statement you highlight refers specifically to the IPS method--embryos and eggs are not needed to make these cells--rather than the field in general. As your comment suggests, many scientists working on reprogramming, Melton included, have emphasized the need to continue with embryonic stem cell research and human therapeutic cloning, as a gold standard with which to compare the new cells.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Emily Singer
      08/27/2008
      Posts:18
      Avg Rating:
      4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.