Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
« Back 1 [2]

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

Faster DNA Sequencing

Continued from page 1

By Emily Singer

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Despite its novel technology, Helicos still has some hurdles to overcome. The technology hasn't yet demonstrated clear advantages over the most sophisticated sequencing machines currently in use. "Single-molecule sequencing has lots of benefits, but it's very hard from an optics standpoint to detect a single molecule on a piece of DNA," says Mardis. Because of this, the Helicos machine is much more expensive than the alternatives.

"We're still a little underwhelmed," says George Weinstock, associate director of the Genome Sequencing Center at Washington University. "Right now, I would say it's a wash, in terms of time and cost. I would say they're a couple of years out from having an impact."

Still, the advance is "a pretty big accomplishment," says Jeff Schloss, director of the Genome Technology Program at the National Human Genome Research Institute in Bethesda, MD. "It's important to get these results in the peer-reviewed literature." Some scientists have criticized a series of impressive but unpublished sequencing claims, saying it's too difficult to evaluate them without having detailed information on the methodology.

Helicos is soon likely to face another slew of competitors. Development of so-called "third generation" sequencing technologies is already under way--these systems aim to sequence a single molecule of DNA in real time, boosting speed and reducing the amount and cost of chemicals used in the process.

Helicos is also moving forward rapidly. The technology used in the Science paper has already been replaced in the company's commercial device, improving on some faults described in the paper, such as difficulty reading certain repetitive sequences.Says Timothy Harris, senior director of research at Helicos and lead author on the paper, "Things change faster than you can publish them."

« Back 1 [2]

Comments

  • At birth?
    Shiladie on 04/08/2008 at 3:20 PM
    Posts:
    35
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    Personally I'd shell out the 1000$ to get myself and any kids I may have in the future their genomes scanned.  Also I don't think it would be a stretch to have this added to public healthcare (in Canada here) so this is done at birth for everyone who wants it.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • huh?
    rocknrollanoah on 04/10/2008 at 4:52 PM
    Posts:
    1
    isn't the $1000 genome already possible?

    www.23andme.com

    maybe i'm missing something.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: huh?
      Emily Singer on 04/14/2008 at 2:25 PM
      Technology Review TR Staff
      Biotechnology and Life Science editor
      Posts:
      13
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      23andMe's service does cost about $1000, but it doesn't offer genome sequencing. It's approach is to search thousands of spots along the genome for specific genetic variations linked to disease and other factors. But the company does not "read" the entire genome, which is what sequencing entails.  
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology