Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
« Back 1 [2]

Friday, November 16, 2007

Tiny, Sensitive Magnetic-Field Detectors

Continued from page 1

By Katherine Bourzac

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Magnetic measurements are also used to study the brain and the heart. Nerve activity in the brain generates very weak magnetic fields--about 10 orders of magnitude smaller than the earth's. Measuring this weak biomagnetism requires highly sensitive magnetic detectors called SQUIDs, which in turn require superconducting materials. The most sensitive SQUIDs must be cooled to within a few degrees of absolute zero with liquid helium; they cost about $2 million.

Kitching's magnetometers are nearly as sensitive as SQUIDs and can operate at room temperature. He says that they are currently sensitive enough to measure magnetic fields from the heart but not from the brain. "Fetal heart monitoring is getting a lot of attention in the medical field" but is difficult because it's not possible to place electrodes directly on a fetus in utero, says Kitching. "Electrical fields don't get to the surface unaffected [by the mother's tissues], but magnetic fields do," he says.

David Cohen, who made some of the first measurements of biomagnetism in the 1960s, says that Kitching's magnetometers "may get to the point where you can measure the heart," but he is skeptical that they will be used to study brain activity. He doubts that a device using the NIST sensors to detect biomagnetism would end up being any cheaper than those that rely on SQUID.

Another potential use for the sensors is in future MRI scanners. "For noninvasive biological measures, this could be a really interesting thing," says Yael Maguire, who, before founding ThingMagic, in Cambridge, MA, worked on miniaturizing nuclear magnetic resonance detectors, a technology similar to MRI. MRI currently requires its own room, specialized technicians, and a large, strong magnet. "The cost of access to the machines" is a problem with MRI, says Maguire. (See "Better Pictures of Proteins.") Highly sensitive, cheap magnetometers like Kitching's could be incorporated into future MRI scanners, enabling them to use smaller magnets, bringing their cost down, and potentially making them portable.

But such clinical applications are many years away. Right now, Kitching says that he's studying the trade-off between the size and sensitivity of the magnetometers and is also designing chips to carry them.

« Back 1 [2]

Comments

  • IED magnetic field?
    cyberpageman on 11/16/2007 at 9:09 AM
    Posts:
    24
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    What causes the magnetic field associated with improvised explosive devices or unexploded ordnance?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: IED magnetic field?
      billg.radix.net on 11/16/2007 at 10:26 AM
      Posts:
      3
      A magnetic field requires either a flow of current or a ferromagnetic object. There would be a flow of current a few milliseconds before the blast, but that is not very useful. The copper slug is not magnetic.
      In the Falkland Islands, the Argentines planted mines on a beach. Plastic mines with plastic explosives and detonators. The Brits left them in place because they don't show up on any mine detector.
        A metal detector, like the airport machines, could find the copper slug, and this magnetomiter might be the ideal sensor. A pulsed magnetic field excites a current flow in the copper, and either a receiver loop or a magnetometer to sense the field after the pulse.
        Otherwise, call Fox Mulder for an X-Files explanation! ;)
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Still looking/waiting for this...
    flared0ne on 12/11/2007 at 8:31 AM
    Posts:
    18
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    I'm looking for a (magnetic field detection) mechanism which intrinsically causes a change in the index of refraction of a material -- which isn't that far from the focus of this article -- the goal being to VISUALLY indicate field strengths within a space being physically swept by an emitter-pumped optical fiber, the surface of which becomes "leaky" in proportion to localized field strengths.

    Imagine a motorized "mop-head" (constant agitation providing visual access to individual fibers) in a non-contact traverse above a "suspect" landscape, visually indicating local field densities.

    Couple this with some form of search coil to pulse the local environment, configured to mask the optical emitter source in phase with the search pulses, to enhance the inherently low-field characteristics of "non-magnetic but conductive" materials...

    (Copyright 11DEC2007)
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology