Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Next-Generation Sports Doping

New drugs in clinical trials for muscle-wasting diseases could become the next big thing for athletes.

By Emily Singer

Friday, October 26, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Two new classes of experimental drugs shown to have powerful muscle-building capabilities--selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) and myostatin inhibitors--have been added to the World Anti-Doping Agency's (WADA) list of prohibited substances for 2008. Neither class of drugs is yet on the market. But the agency, an international, independent organization based in Lausanne, Switzerland, that coordinates anti-doping regulations across sports, is gearing up for future abuse by limiting use among athletes and by developing new detection methods. "We now have convincing data on those drugs and what they can do," says Olivier Rabin, science director at WADA. "We have a duty to act as early as we can when drugs have the potential to be doping agents."

Enhanced performance: Olympic runner Marion Jones, shown here winning the 100 meter at the 2000 Olympics, admitted to using steroids, after years of denials. The World Anti-Doping Agency aims to prevent future abuse by tracking drugs with performance-enhancing potential while they are still in development.
Credit: AP Images/Doug Mills

Unlike with testosterone and other anabolic steroids, the action of SARMs and myostatin inhibitors is restricted to muscle, likely limiting side effects. That's a very good thing for patients, but it also makes the drugs more attractive to those looking to bulk up. "I think there's a whole new horizon for anabolic therapies, and the potential for abuse will be exceedingly high," says William Evans, director of the Nutrition, Metabolism, and Exercise Laboratory at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

Compounds of both classes are currently in clinical trials for muscle wasting related to diseases such as cancer and muscular dystrophy. There have been no official reports of athletes using these drugs, but because there previously have been cases of athletes gaining access to compounds in clinical development, WADA officials say that they want to act early.

SARMs work similarly to testosterone but in a more targeted way. "They are effective by binding to the steroid receptor in only specific tissue, like muscle," says Evans, who is also a scientific advisor to GTx, a company developing the drugs. "They are not steroid drugs, but they produce the anabolic effect of the steroids." GTx, based in Memphis, TN, has shown in a clinical trial that one compound being developed for muscle wasting and bone loss can significantly boost lean muscle mass in older people.

Myostatin inhibitors work through a fundamentally different mechanism. They block myostatin, a naturally occurring protein in the body that stops growth of skeletal muscle. Cattle, sheep, dogs, and, in one confirmed case, a human with mutations in this gene are extremely muscular. (See "Mimicking the Massively Muscular.")

Story continues below

Scientists have developed antibodies to myostatin and other molecules that can boost lean muscle mass in animals by as much as 60 percent. It's not yet clear how well myostatin inhibitors will work in humans. Clinical studies of two myostatin inhibitors are now under way for muscular dystrophy and other muscle-wasting diseases.

WADA is developing detection methods for both SARMs and myostatin inhibitors, although the agency declined to say how far along those tests are. "In fairness to athletes who stay clean, we don't say when detection tools are available," says Rabin. "We say when we detect the first athletes using the drugs."

Comments

  • What is fair and unfair?
    People with extraordinary athletic ability are likely to have genes or combination of genes that give them their ability. This can of course be enhanced by diet and training.

    The genes that they have inherited produce proteins or other compounds,  that give them extraordinary strength, or speed or flexibility or agility. This could also be as a result of the genes blocking the effect of other compounds which otherwise limit these abilities in "normal" populations, such as the genes, naturally occurring, which block myostatin in "freak" animals and humans.

    We would not accuse these "freaks" of cheating if they went onto win Olympic medals. Why then should we judge people as cheats who use, or will in future use, science to mimic the effects that these athletic "freaks" naturally enjoy.

    To my mind anabolic steroids should be banned, not because they are unfair, but because they are not a natural phenomenon, because they lopsidedly enhance performance in the short term, and because they cause drastic harm to the person taking them and even to others because of "droid rage".

    Will mimics of naturally occurring genetic enhancing effects also cause harm to the body? No! How do we know? Because extraordinary athletes generally enjoy long and healthy lives so using science to mimic these genetic effects in lesser mortals will also not harm the body - it has been tried and tested by evolution.

    More importantly we should try and decipher and use genetic evolution to enhance intelligence, so that ordinary people have the chance to enjoy the genius of Galileo or Newton and beyond.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    rajnz
    10/26/2007
    Posts:25
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • really safe?
      your statement that these therapies are safe for everybody is not valid for a couple reasons.  u imply that what works for the athletes will work for everybody, thats not necessarily true. u also imply that we will be able to mimic exactly whats going on in the few naturally occurring cases, and i just dont think anybody knows enough to say that with certainty. plus, there might be side effects that only show up 20 years down the line, and by then its too late.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      sacapiloa
      10/26/2007
      Posts:9
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: What is fair and unfair?
      Nice try.
      Many of the roid rangers die young. Look at pro wrestlers.  Some of these mutants live long, some die young.  Some handle one mutation, because of a second.  If you mimick one without the other, you die.  If it was possible to limit them to adult professionals, maybe (mutant league)
      But children (or parents) who want to compete will feel the need to juice.  Many of those will still fail to compete and will have their bodies wrecked.  Live fast, die young, fame is forever.
      2 out of 3 aint good.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      SirLanse
      10/26/2007
      Posts:40
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: What is fair and unfair?
        I accept that at our current state of knowledge we do not know enough to exactly mimic what works for some people of extraordinary ability.

        My point really is this - evolution has been working for a very long time. During this time of trial and error it has thrown up some examples of mutants (freaks) with exceptional ability, intellectually and physically. Some of these experiments have been successful also by the criteria that they have simultaneously allowed people of exceptional ability to have long and healthy lives. As examples we could have healthy and long-lived scientists and intellectuals of the present and past.

        In the physical field, mutants animals with genes that silence myostatin appear to be otherwise healthy - to point out just one example.

        Evolution is ongoing. I think we should no longer be content to entrust the future of coming generations, or even ours for that matter, to the blind roll of natures dice and accept that some people will be born with Lou Gehrig’s disease, Cystic fibrosis, or Huntington’s disease, to name just a few. Or that these, or other, genetic defects should not be corrected in people already having it.

        Logically it follows that we should decode the genetic code, of which we are still very ignorant, and using natures vast store of experiments do intelligent design of our own to proceed ever more rapidly down the path of evolution.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        rajnz
        10/26/2007
        Posts:25
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
  • not only for muscle wasting diseases
    Could this also be used as an alternative to surgery for weight loss patients?
    After all when we have more lean muscle it increases metabolism.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    urian1975
    10/26/2007
    Posts:16
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: not only for muscle wasting diseases
      In the March 1 2002 issue of the Journal of Clinical Investigation it was reported by Hopkins scientists that - for mice genetically altered to get fat, knocking out the myostatin gene keeps them leaner and healthier. "Mighty" versions of those obese animals did not develop insulin resistance.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      rajnz
      10/27/2007
      Posts:25
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • doping for dopes
    In the first century AD., Roman gladiators, who got their name from the short Roman sword, the gladius, experimented with caffeine, alcohol, nitroglycerin, opium, and strychnine, in order to help them compete in the arena. Sugar Ray Robinson admitted to drinking a cup of ox blood regularily to boost his strength. The governor of California, Arnold Swarzenegger, confessed to using steroids. The sport of swimming, track and field, and cycling has been riddled with the practice of using performance enhancers to level the playing field. So if you were an athelete who specialized in one particular sport for a number of years and saw his fellow competitors cheating on a regular basis, how long do you think it would take before you were tempted to do the same?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    phoenix
    10/26/2007
    Posts:172
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • (professional) Sports - a meaningless human activity
    Perhaps we should also ask a deeper question, not just a technical one on doping.

    What is the real purpose of professional sports?

    Sports had a real-life use in the old days. Sports simulated and enhanced the skills necessary for survival. It was important for a community to know who the fastest, strongest, most skillful members were, so they could be used for hunting and warfare.

    But what is the point of this today? Running in circles around a track, throwing or hitting some balls in completely arbitrary games?...Not only that, but people dedicating their entire lives, to say, how to hit perfectly a golf ball...????...Also drugging yourself so you can perform highly in activities which are utterly useless and pointless.

    This only shows how deeply delusional the masses are.

    PS - personal sporting activities are of course a different category.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gabrielg01
    10/27/2007
    Posts:361
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: (professional) Sports - a meaningless human activity
      I am glad someone posed the question of why do we have professional sports. It is my understanding that competitive sport was born with the creation of the Olympic games. The Greeks represent to me the passage from East to West in the development and evolution of the human mind and human nature as it relates to its environment.
      The Eastern mindset puts the 'group' before the individual. The Western mindset grants the 'individual' a unique identity with corresponding rights and responsibilities. Competitive sport is the ultimate expression of self (on a physical level). Thusly we owe our entire perspective of life, living, and loving to the shattering of these Eastern constraints.
      So if we view sport as a celebration of self, of the individual encouraged, praised and elevated in stature for individual achievement, must we not then condemn the perversion of this high ideal through the use artificial and contrived means. Professional sport is a money machine, and as such has no conscience. The outrage against doping is a product of 'unfair business practices' more than it is an insult to the purists among sports fans.
      I like the idea of a MUTANT LEAGUE as previously proffered. Let them dope, who cares, but keep the playing field level, and let the players be known for what they are. Rant complete.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      rafael7
      10/27/2007
      Posts:9
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: (professional) Sports - a meaningless human activity
        Everything has some meaning. Professional sports is the opiate of the couch potatoes. We can live our lives vicariously through the modern day gladiators. So they provide something of value to the public.
        They also provide a living for the gladiators themselves and their families. But because its a profession - there is the pressure to perform and the temptation to abuse the body for short term gains. Lance Armstrong? Chris Benoit? the list is endless.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        rajnz
        10/28/2007
        Posts:25
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
  • [no subject]
    I'll agree that people who naturally have performance-enhancing mutations should be left alone. Every extraordinary athlete can give partial credit to his genes; what sense does it make to say, "Well, genes a, b and c are okay, but gene z, THAT'S  not fair."
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Monsterboy
    10/29/2007
    Posts:72
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Forget muscle wasting
    As a 45-year-old, I can tell you young ones out there that muscle wasting is not the main issue as you age.  The underlying problem is "joint wasting."  This causes strenuous exercise to become more and more painful, until finally you give it up entirely.  At that point, your muscles start atrophying.

    I would gladly take medicine that restored my joints to the proper working order I had when I was 20 -- even if I knew ahead of time that it would take 10 years off my life.  (And please, don't anybody suggest glucosamine as the magic solution.)
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dmm
    10/29/2007
    Posts:172
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Forget muscle wasting
      Orthopedist John Uribe recommends building stronger quadriceps and hamstrings to preserve knee function despite aging, but he also says the knee benefits from carrying less weight--lose the love handles and excessive upper body muscle mass.
      At 62, creating stronger muscle in the quads and hams is well nigh impossible without some ergogenic drugs. I have seen no proof that such sensible drug usage shortens life.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      garygromet
      10/30/2007
      Posts:10
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: Forget muscle wasting
      I hope I am not misinterpreting your statement, but it seems that you're saying that at age 45 your joints are not working well enough to allow you to exercise vigorously (without pain)?  If so, that is too bad -- but don't assume that it's true for everyone.  I'm 41 and I notice almost no difference at all in my joints from when I was 20.  (Of course that could change in the next 4 years.)  Are you running, or have you been a runner?  That seems particularly hard on one's joints.  Or perhaps you have some genetic pre-dispostion?  My mother had quite serious arthritis by my age, so perhaps I've dodged that bullet.  Either way, my joints haven't kept me from exercising like a madman.  Of course, my exercise of choice is mainly swimming, so perhaps I would find a different experience if I were running 5 miles a day.  Perhaps you should try swimming?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      fastfilm
      10/30/2007
      Posts:2
  • Muscle wasting disease
    What surgeries are there fo being underweight?
    And
    Whats the sense of having good joints forever to be able to exercise if it would cost you ten years anyway?Isnt the point of exercise to live longer?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    McMillan968
    10/29/2007
    Posts:38
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: Muscle wasting disease
      For me at least, the point of exercise is NOT so that you can live longer.  You do it because having a fit body allows you to enjoy life.  And hopefully you can enjoy the exercise some.

      Do you REALLY want to spend your last 30 years, from say 50 to 80, getting progressively all hunched-up and crippled, barely able to move around or to do anything with your hands, because of the shooting agony that entails?  If some drug could give you a choice, wouldn't you rather have 20 years of good health and vigorous activity instead?  All I'm saying is, I'd opt for the latter.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      dmm
      10/30/2007
      Posts:172
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • The inconsistency of it all
    1. If you happen to be born with silent myostatin gene(s), then it's ok to win olympic gold medals.

    2. If you try to minimise the effect of myostatin  via biochemical means, you are cheating? Duh...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Dai Viet
    11/01/2007
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • HGH
    HGH, I have a feeling will be mother load of all suppliments. Undetectable, and initial studies have looked very promising. Testo this type of product can take years, so we will see.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jjbaulikki
    07/01/2009
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    1/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.