While it's not yet clear if similar rates will be seen in humans, high doses of anabolic steroids, which carry serious side effects, increase muscle mass by a maximum of 15 to 20 percent. And because myostatin is found only in muscle, knocking it out does not appear to have the adverse effects of broader-acting steroids. Acceleron plans to begin trials of its drug for muscular dystrophy, a genetic disorder of progressive muscle loss that usually kills sufferers before they reach age 30, in early 2008. Trials for cancer and ALS will follow. Acceleron's Big Pharma competitors are farther along. In 2005, Wyeth, headquartered in Madison, NJ, began a clinical trial of an antibody to myostatin that binds to it and blocks its activity, as a treatment for two forms of muscular dystrophy. Results were expected to be released late last year, but the company declined to comment on the current status. Amgen, headquartered in Thousand Oaks, CA, is analyzing results from a recently completed safety trial of its own myostatin inhibitor. The company is also testing a second inhibitor as a countermeasure to space-flight-induced muscle changes. Mice aboard the Space Shuttle Endeavor in August were given Amgen's experimental drug to determine if it could slow muscle loss in microgravity. While initial clinical trials are focused on relatively rare conditions such as muscular dystrophy, safe muscle-building drugs have a broad potential market. "There is no effective agent to prevent the accelerated loss of muscle associated with disease, infection, or illness, such as cancer, heart failure, and kidney disease and dialysis," says William Evans, director of the Nutrition, Metabolism, and Exercise Laboratory at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. Muscle loss is linked to increased mortality in these patients, as well as to an individual's level of disability resulting from normal aging. "As treatments of disease like cancer and heart failure become more effective, the issue becomes more prominent," says Evans. For example, treating cancer patients with a muscle-building drug may allow oncologists to administer extra rounds of chemotherapy. In addition to treating muscle wasting, such drugs might prove effective in treating metabolic disorders, such as insulin resistance, which is linked to obesity and diabetes. Previous research has shown that diet-induced obese mice given Acceleron's drug showed an increase in lean muscle mass and reduced fasting glucose and insulin levels. Says Evans, "I think these drugs, perhaps used in combo with exercise, might have great potential in reversing the trend toward increasing obesity and decreasing muscle mass." |
Audio »
Share »
Digg this
Add to del.icio.us
Add to Reddit
Add to Facebook
Slashdot It!
Stumble It!
Add to Newsvine
Add to Connotea
Add to CiteUlike
Add to Furl
Googlize this
Add to Rojo
Add to MyWeb
Favorite
Print
E-mail
New Drugs Mimic Exercise
07/31/2008
Comments
nekote on 10/18/2007 at 8:15 AM
115
But, a new type of 'roid for athletes?
And, couch potatoes - skip the gym?
Emily Singer on 10/18/2007 at 11:44 AM
Biotechnology and Life Science editor
13
lowilliams on 10/18/2007 at 2:46 PM
17
This new group of drugs would be great for me.
kittensteak on 10/18/2007 at 11:07 AM
2
amulekii on 10/18/2007 at 3:03 PM
10
MacLir on 10/18/2007 at 4:46 PM
4
But the big problem with steroid use in sports is that it "un-levels the playing field", giving the advantage to deep pockets rather than skill.
zippo on 10/18/2007 at 8:07 PM
24
A person using this sort of treatment would also have to find a way to roughly double his/her bone density so that they're not breaking their fingers doing stuff that's normally not possible. Then you have to consider the strain on your respiratory system. You have to have enough blood running fast enough through your veins so that those muscles don't run dry doing every day tasks and better kidneys to filter it. You also have to have a set of heavy-duty lungs to oxygenate all of that extra blood and a heart that will pump it fast enough. It's like the world of high-perfrmance auto racing where the key elements are fuel, air, engine, chassis, and drive train. This new class of drugs provides the human analogue of a super-fancy drive train. However, with out the fuel/air/engine (food/lungs/blood, heart, etc.) to power it, it'll never get past second gear without stalling and the chassis (skeleton) will never survive the extra torque.
It kinda scares me when I think about the sort of research-driven market that could spring up when people can experience muscle gains this big, and I mean not only in athletics but mainstream as well. I think the only reason it hasn't is because traditonal steroids don't see such dramatic effects ( am I right?) and their side effects are so terrible. We'll just have to see what the side-effects of these new myostatin drugs are. I think they will all be related to the extra weight-gain of a 60+ % boost in muscle mass.
I do think that this could be a huge boon for people with the muscle waisting diseases though, as long the absence of myostatin isn't screwing with the production of other proteins and hormones. It's always happened in the past that ,when a drug goes bad there has been an unforseen chain-reaction and the mistakes occur somewhere way-down that chain. We'll just have to study every effect to Nth degree with this stuff.
rajnz on 10/19/2007 at 12:05 PM
23
Zippo is quite right that a 60% increase in muscle mass on the body an skeleton of an otherwise "normal" 90 pound weakling could place an overwhelming burden on the skeleton and heart and maybe other unforeseen side effects. But what if we could stop the muscle growth at 20% or any other artificial figure? What if we could also make the skeleton and heart mightier along with muscles? This calls for more research not less to understand the exact processes of the body.
As for the argument that it would be "cheating" I don't buy that. Do you cheat when you train or have a better diet than a subsistence survivor from sub Saharan Africa? Does a 90 pond weakling cheat if he tries to better the hand that nature has dealt him compared to that of an Olympic athlete? To my mind the answer is no.
rajnz on 10/19/2007 at 12:18 PM
23
GaryB on 10/20/2007 at 3:02 PM
42
Who actually wants to see an anything goes enhanced Olympics? See, if we let adult age athletes do what they want to do to win, they'll test stuff that you'll use if you ever need it to stave off a wasting disease.
rajnz on 10/21/2007 at 7:46 PM
23
What is needed is more research to see what is safe and what is not. In the above article it has been mentioned that "because myostatin is found only in muscle, knocking it out does not appear to have the adverse effects of broader-acting steroids." It also appears to "increase lean muscle mass and reduce fasting glucose and insulin levels", all good things. It remains to be seen what the adverse effects are.
We need to figure out the genetic code to better ourselves. Rid ourselves of disease and death, enhance our bodies and make ourselves more intelligent. This is just one paragraph of a chapter in the book.
Le Petomane on 10/19/2007 at 1:06 PM
10
justinjfer on 10/21/2007 at 8:13 AM
1
As far as sports go, I am all for safe supplementation. I am tired of watching caveman vs. caveman. I would rather watch superman vs. superman.
normski on 07/19/2008 at 4:59 AM
1
if it's safe, I would try it, being into body building for over 25 years, I am always looking for some assistance, where and wehn can we buy or try it????