Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Mimicking the Massively Muscular

New drugs that mimic mutations found in buff animals could treat muscle-wasting diseases.

By Emily Singer

Thursday, October 18, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Scattered throughout the mammalian menagerie are a few supermuscular freaks: double-muscled cows more ripped than any bodybuilder; racing dogs too burly to run; sheep praised for their massively muscled buttocks; and even one small German boy, born in 2000 with muscles twice the size of those of a normal newborn. All these Herculean creatures share one thing: naturally occurring mutations in a gene that produces myostatin, a protein that blocks growth of skeletal muscle. Disable that gene, and voila--spectacular muscle growth results.

Bully whippet: The dog in the photo is supermuscular because of naturally occurring mutations that silence both versions of the myostatin gene. Called bully whippets, these dogs are rarely champion racers. However, animals with one mutated and one normal version of the gene are more muscular than typical animals and are among the breed’s fastest racers.
Credit: Stuart Isett, Polaris

Over the past few years, pharmaceutical companies have been racing to develop ways to mimic myostatin gene mutations in the hope of treating everything from the muscle loss that accompanies muscular dystrophy, cancer, and aging to obesity and other metabolic disorders. Pharmaceutical giants Wyeth and Amgen are expected to release clinical-trial results of myostatin inhibitors for muscle-wasting diseases within the next few months. A smaller company, Acceleron Pharma, based in Cambridge, MA, says that its more broadly acting drug could bring more brawn than can drugs targeting myostatin alone.

"There's been a huge amount of interest for human therapeutics," says Se-Jin Lee, a biologist at John's Hopkins University, in Baltimore. "If you could increase or maintain muscle strength as people age, you could have a tremendous impact on health and well-being."

Lee discovered more than a decade ago that mice lacking myostatin grew muscles twice the size of those of their normal counterparts. But because mice have levels of myostatin 50 to 80 times that of humans, some scientists have doubted how well the results will translate to humans. New findings published in August in the journal PLoS ONE suggest that other molecules are also at work in muscle. Lee found that he could double the extra growth in mice lacking myostatin--effectively quadrupling muscle mass--by turning up levels of another protein. "That means there must be other regulators that have at least as important a function as myostatin in blocking muscle growth," says Lee.

Mighty muscles: The image shows the difference between normal mice (left) and mice that lack myostatin and overproduce another protein, giving them four times as much muscle. Scientists are developing drugs that act through similar mechanisms to treat muscle-wasting diseases.
Credit: Se-Jin Lee, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Story continues below

Acceleron's approach attempts to take advantage of that. Rather than designing an antibody to myostatin itself, as is being tested in the Wyeth trials, scientists at Acceleron fused a portion of the receptor molecule that usually binds to myostatin with a tag that allows the drug ACE-031 to roam freely throughout the body so that it can sop up myostatin before it activates the signal to stop muscle growth. Animal studies show that this approach boosts muscle growth more effectively than does merely eliminating myostatin, suggesting that the fusion molecule also binds to other agents that impact muscle development.

Normal mice given the drug show a 30 to 60 percent increase in muscle mass, and mice with a version of muscular dystrophy show increased grip strength, a standard measure of rodent strength. Preliminary results from primate studies show that the animals on the drug bulk up at similar rates to those seen in rodents. "Before I became involved with Acceleron, if someone had told me you could increase muscle mass by up to 60 percent in a month, I never would have believed it," says CEO John Knopf.

Comments

  • A new "steroid" for athletes?
    Great for people suffering with muscle wasting diseases!
    But, a new type of 'roid for athletes?
    And, couch potatoes - skip the gym?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    nekote
    10/18/2007
    Posts:138
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: A new "steroid" for athletes?
      "We plan to run an article about the potential for abuse for these and other drugs next week."
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Emily Singer
      10/18/2007
      Posts:20
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: A new "steroid" for athletes?
      I am 74 and had a very bad reaction to one of the satins in 2005 The reaqction nearly destroyed the muscles in my legs. I am better but still cannot make it up a flight of more than 3 steps, and no steps if I am carrying something. I spend 40 minutes twice a week on a treadmill to help my leg muscles.
       
      This new group of drugs would be great for me. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      lowilliams
      10/18/2007
      Posts:17
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Screams Abuse Potential
    We won't have to worry about testing volunteers for this drug when it comes available.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kittensteak
    10/18/2007
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Why does enhancement have to be considered inherently abusive?
    Fine if you want to argue against it. I'm not even arguing for it. But it bothers me that biological enhancement of normal human capability is considered out of the question by most people.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    amulekii
    10/18/2007
    Posts:10
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Why does enhancement have to be considered inherently abusive?
      The problems with steroids are two-fold. One is the well-known side effects - I had to take a course of a steroid based medicine, and it gave me the sweet and retiring personality of a rabid werewolf for the duration. Also, the physiologically damaging physical side effects of continued use are a real risk to the user.

      But the big problem with steroid use in sports is that it "un-levels the playing field", giving the advantage to deep pockets rather than skill.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      MacLir
      10/18/2007
      Posts:9
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
  • The rest of your body will have to keep up.
         Imagine the kind of effort it would take to mantain this sort of muscle growth in a normal human. First, you would have to eat several high calorie meals a day or you would be miserable from hunger pains. You won't be able to put your left or right hand on the same shoulder because your biceps are too big. Plus, I've seen some bad bone breaks by weight lifters whose bones couldn't support the loads that their muscles were perfectly willing to accept. That's only in normal humans and those who use "traditional" steroids.
         A person using this sort of treatment would also have to find a way to roughly double his/her bone density so that they're not breaking their fingers doing stuff that's normally not possible. Then you have to consider the strain on your respiratory system. You have to have enough blood running fast enough through your veins so that those muscles don't run dry doing every day tasks and better kidneys to filter it. You also have to have a set of heavy-duty lungs to oxygenate all of that extra blood and a heart that will pump it fast enough. It's like the world of high-perfrmance auto racing where the key elements are fuel, air, engine, chassis, and drive train. This new class of drugs provides the human analogue of a super-fancy drive train. However, with out the fuel/air/engine (food/lungs/blood, heart, etc.) to power it, it'll never get past second gear without stalling and the chassis (skeleton) will never survive the extra torque.
         It kinda scares me when I think about the sort of research-driven market that could spring up when people can experience muscle gains this big, and I mean not only in athletics but mainstream as well. I think the only reason it hasn't is because traditonal steroids don't see such dramatic effects ( am I right?) and their side effects are so terrible. We'll just have to see what the side-effects of these new myostatin drugs are. I think they will all be related to the extra weight-gain of a 60+ % boost in muscle mass.
         I do think that this could be a huge boon for people with the muscle waisting diseases though, as long the absence of myostatin isn't screwing with the production of other proteins and hormones. It's always happened in the past that ,when a drug goes bad there has been an unforseen chain-reaction and the mistakes occur somewhere way-down that chain. We'll just have to study every effect to Nth degree with this stuff.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    zippo
    10/18/2007
    Posts:24
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • A word in the defence of research
      It was known in 1997 that the same genetic "secret formula" that gave unusually large muscles to the "mighty mice" engineered by The Johns Hopkins University, was also at work naturally in specially bred cattle that have extra muscle. Muscular cattle breeds like the Belgian Blue and the Piedmontese have a genetic mutation that blocks myostatin as do some sheep which are likewise bred for their meat.
      Zippo is quite right that a 60% increase in muscle mass on the body an skeleton of an otherwise "normal" 90 pound weakling could place an overwhelming burden on the skeleton and heart and maybe other unforeseen side effects. But what if we could stop the muscle growth at 20% or any other artificial figure? What if we could also make the skeleton and heart mightier along with muscles? This calls for more research not less to understand the exact processes of the body.
      As for the argument that it would be "cheating" I don't buy that. Do you cheat when you train or have a better diet than a subsistence survivor from sub  Saharan Africa? Does a 90 pond weakling cheat if he tries to better the hand that nature has dealt him compared to that of an Olympic athlete? To my mind the answer is no.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      rajnz
      10/19/2007
      Posts:25
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: A word in the defence of research
        Addendum - to my mind a 90 pond weakling would not be cheating in trying to better the hand dealt to him, neither would an Olympic athlete, or someone suffering from muscular dystrophy, or from muscle loss due to age, or anyone at any stage in life. No one, in other words. Evolution works to make us stronger, faster, more intelligent.  We have the means to give evolution a helping hand - speed it up. We should use it.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        rajnz
        10/19/2007
        Posts:25
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
      • Re: A word in the defence of research
        OK, show of (muscled) hands:

        Who actually wants to see an anything goes enhanced Olympics?  See, if we let adult age athletes do what they want to do to win, they'll test stuff that you'll use if you ever need it to stave off a wasting disease. 
        Rate this comment: 12345

        GaryB
        10/20/2007
        Posts:64
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        • Re: A word in the defence of research
          The attempted sarcasm was unneeded and a bit flat alas. As a matter of fact many Olympic athletes, and other athletes, world class or otherwise, have always used the latest knowledge and research to try and enhance themselves. They have been the human guinea pigs of  research otherwise sanctioned for (other) animals.

          What is needed is more research to see what is safe and what is not. In the above article it has been mentioned that "because myostatin is found only in muscle, knocking it out does not appear to have the adverse effects of broader-acting steroids." It also appears to "increase lean muscle mass and reduce fasting glucose and insulin levels", all good things. It remains to be seen what the adverse effects are.

          We need to figure out the genetic code to better ourselves. Rid ourselves of disease and death, enhance our bodies and make ourselves more intelligent. This is just one paragraph of a chapter in the book.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          rajnz
          10/21/2007
          Posts:25
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
  • Nothing suggest harmful effects
    The mice don't die sooner becaused of the added musculature. The pictures of animals I've seen with it don't look fat. Your heart, lungs, and blood supply grow according to your bodies needs.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Le Petomane
    10/19/2007
    Posts:11
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • I am all for safe enhancement
    Why is it always considered "abuse" when someone wants to improve themselves. Humans have always tried every means possible to improve themselves. New research like this will help cure disease as well as help people live longer and healthier.

    As far as sports go, I am all for safe supplementation. I am tired of watching caveman vs. caveman. I would rather watch superman vs. superman.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    justinjfer
    10/21/2007
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • ACE-031
    I agree: just because someone wishes to improve themself, it's somehow abuse! why!

    if it's safe, I would try it, being into body building for over 25 years, I am always looking for some assistance, where and wehn can we buy or try it????
    Rate this comment: 12345

    normski
    07/19/2008
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.