Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Gene Variant Linked to Heart Disease

Two groups of scientists have independently identified a genetic variant that significantly raises the risk of heart disease.

By Bijal Trivedi

Friday, May 04, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Two competing teams of researchers have identified the same genetic variant, located on human chromosome 9, that confers a 40 to 60 percent increased risk of heart disease in the studied populations.

Credit: Technology Review

Heart disease is the leading cause of death worldwide. "Because it is such a common disease, people were concerned it would be difficult to find genetic variants that predispose to it, but now we have it," says Kari Stefansson, one of the team leaders and the CEO of Iceland's DeCode Genetics, which has been a key player in the quest to identify disease genes. The DeCode scientists, says Stefansson, found a genetic variant that predisposes people to "early-onset heart attack in males under 50 and women under 60."

The roots of heart disease are complicated because there are both genetic and environmental components. Cigarette smoking, for example, doubles the risk of heart attack. The new research suggests that the roughly 25 percent of Caucasians who have inherited two copies of the "risk variant" have a 40 to 60 percent increased risk of heart disease, as compared with someone who doesn't carry the variant at all. "It is a very big risk factor ... almost up to the level of smoking and a little bit greater than elevated cholesterol," says Stefansson.

The other team of researchers, led by Ruth McPherson, director of the lipid clinic and lipid research laboratory at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute, in Canada, and Jonathan Cohen, a geneticist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, in Dallas, focused its search on severe, premature cases of heart disease that struck before age 60. Both reports appear in the May 4 issue of the journal Science.

Story continues below


Although heart disease is highly inheritable, says McPherson, the genetic variations that increased disease risk were largely unknown. To this end, both teams cast a wide net by using whole genome association studies to identify genetic risk factors. The method involves screening the DNA of two groups of individuals--those with coronary-artery disease, and healthy controls with no signs of disease--against a collection of common genetic variations called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The scientists then search for particular SNPs that are associated with the disease more often than not.

McPherson's team used DNA samples from four different populations, comprising a total of 23,000 individuals, and screened them using approximately 100,000 SNPs. The researchers discovered a strong association between two of these genetic variants on chromosome 9 and risk of early heart disease. Scientists at DeCode conducted a higher-resolution scan using about 300,000 SNPs and five populations, totaling 17,000 individuals, and identified three SNPs with significant ties to heart disease.

Comments

  • This study is junk science
    Another news piece on this study said explicitly that they do not have any idea by what mechanism these mutations cause heart disease.  There are only two ways to develop heart disease; faulty cholesterol metabolism, and impaired glucose metabolism, both easy to clinically demonstrate in large numbers of the people who have them well before tehy actually get heart disease as many people did during the course of this study.   You can't do genetic medical research by just feeding in genetic code and printing a computer printout, you have to do actual medicine.  How could they make no effort to learn which common glaring and easy to detect metabolic problem ailed their research subjects with the genetic mutations who developed heart disease?   We're talking about several tests for impaired glucose metabolism and one simple blood test for high cholesterol!  This study is junk science, and it needs to be condemned as such.   Mutations might be there, might not, but the people who did this study need to be drummed out of their profession as an example to other scientists to make sure they've grown heads before they do research.  
    Rate this comment: 12345

    villandra
    05/04/2007
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: This study is junk science
      Well, I'm certainly glad you're not the one that decides who gets research funding.  That policy of considering any research as junk if it doesn't give you 100% of the answer right now, would rule out a vast majority of medical research.

      This seems like pretty important breakthrough in our knowledge of heart disease.  Next step may indeed be studies to try to link particular genetic markers with corresponding clinical indicators such as elevated serum cholesterol or blood sugar imbalances.  Final step would then probably be trying to figure out exact metabolic pathways that account for the physiological changes associated with the genes.

      To almost any scientist in the world the phrase junk science would imply flawed studies where the claimed result is not demonstrated by the experiment or analysis.  You certainly seem to be expanding the meaning, counterproductively I might add, by labeling something junk merely because you think a particular researcher should have started with a different set of goals for a particular study.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      rhapsodyingl...
      05/08/2007
      Posts:59
      Avg Rating:
      4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.