The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Scientists have uncovered genetic targets that could increase lung-cancer cells' sensitivity.
Researchers have used a genome-wide screen to uncover genes that protect lung-cancer cells from Taxol (paclitaxel), a commonly used chemotherapy agent. Without the protection of certain genes, the cancer cells could be killed by drug doses 10,000 times lower than normal. The results could lead to synergistic drug combinations that combat tumors at lower doses with fewer side effects.
The study, performed by researchers at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, is one of the first to use the gene-silencing technique called RNA interference to study drug sensitivity across the entire genome. Led by cell biologist Michael White, the researchers used a library of silencing RNAs to block expression of every known gene in the human genome--there are about 21,000--in only six weeks.
The University of Texas researchers found 87 genes that seemed to regulate the cancer's sensitivity to the chemotherapy drug. Drugs and natural products that interfere with some of these genes already exist, says White, and researchers can now test whether combining these drugs with Taxol leads to a better response.
The results point to "a way to be more savvy about how to combine drugs," says Tito Fojo, a senior investigator at the National Cancer Institute's Center for Cancer Research, although he cautions that "some trial and error" will still be required.
Cancer patients' responses to chemotherapy agents such as Taxol vary widely and unpredictably. Some patients do not get better; some do but later relapse as their tumors grow resistant to the drug. "We want to identify the molecular basis of the capacity of cancer cells to respond to a drug," says White. Taxol is given to most lung-cancer patients and is also a common treatment for breast and ovarian cancers. Like all chemotherapy, it causes side effects including pain, nausea, and tingling. A combination treatment that would allow the drug to be given at a much lower dose could make chemotherapy easier on patients.
To identify the target genes, the researchers used an RNA-interference library made commercially available only in the past year and a half. The library allows scientists to reliably silence every human gene.
That broad sweep pointed toward a role for some surprising genes in protecting the cancer cells from Taxol. The drug works by interfering with cell division, but many of the genes uncovered in the Texas screen, such as a sperm-specific protein often found in ovarian-cancer cells, are not implicated in that process.
While the Texas study uncovered some genes that seem to make cancer cells more vulnerable to Taxol than normal cells are, Fojo cautions that new therapies won't be on the way unless there are good drugs to take advantage of these vulnerabilities. "The more we understand about how drugs work, the better," he says. "We're going to see a lot of use of [RNA interference] in this matter."
Interesting work... Has it been published anywhere yet?
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
nekote
139 Comments
Kill all cells with non-human genes?
There are only 21,000 genes in the human genome?
Sounds very low - what did I miss?
Assuming this continues to go well, will it eventually enable a "universal" health drug that will target and destroy all cells / DNA that have non-human genes?
Say good by to all non-human genes within the body?
Pneumonia, Tetnus, Salmonella, ....
Cancer?
Viruses, too?
No more colds and sniffles?
Providing a very sudden and dramatic increase in life expenctancy, world wide?
Reply
ms
190 Comments
Re: Kill all cells with non-human genes?
Be careful, there are lots of beneficial organisms living in/on our bodies.
Reply
nekote
139 Comments
"Good guys" get an exemption
Of course, "Good guy" genes - any beneficial / symbiotic organisms / genes get a pass.
Even though they might not be Human, per se.
That would be a key part of vetting / testing - ensuring safety, efficacy and viability?
Reply
Sky9Pilot
1 Comment
Re: Kill all cells with non-human genes?
The 21,000 number, I think the author is trying to say, refers to the number of "silencing RNAs" that "block expression of every known gene in the human genome."
Remember that the genome is an organism’s complete set of DNA, and the human genome has some 3 billion base pairs (e.g., ATTCCGGA).
But genes comprise only about 2% of the human genome; the remainder consists of noncoding regions (that have other functions). The human genome is therefore estimated to contain 20,000-25,000 genes.
So the fact that only 21,000 silencing RNAs exist that block every expression in a genome of some 3 billion base pairs, but only 20 to 25K genes, seems reasonable.
Reply
nekote
139 Comments
Genes only 2% of human genome?
The human genome has 3 billion base pairs?
But genes only comprise 2% of the DNA?
Showing my ignorance.
What's the remaining 98% about?
Reply
Buckwheat469
34 Comments
Re: Genes only 2% of human genome?
The remaining 98% of the human genome is an extended programming language that's based on the first life form that we evolved from (probably some sort of germ). Scientists have uncovered that parts of our genes have commonality with lowly worms, just as we are only 2% different than Chimps. We don't have very many properties of being a worm though, except that worms and humans have cells, some organs that are necessary for life, and these items must work together in some fashion. How does this all happen? It's the programming language of DNA.
As for this article, some comments sounded like the reader was confused. There has been found 20,000 silencing RNA strands that inhibit various pieces of the programming language that I mentioned above. The idea of the article is that when a cancer is in the lungs it has protection from chemicals because of the protective properties of the lungs. Certain organs are designed with certain properties that allow it to be in harsher environments, the lungs have the ability to breath certain toxins (like oxygen) without dying. The researchers have inhibited some of this protective capacity to get to the cancer more easily, so the article says that some 87 RNA silencers have been found to do something with the lungs that makes the cancer easier to maintain with Taxol.
It makes no mention about killing off non-human genes, since most cancer is human genes with bad programming. Imagine some chemical damages a cell (like cigarettes damaging the lung's cells). Over time these cells become so genetically damaged that the DNA cannot regulate the production of cells and a cancer is born.
Reply
swordfishdata
7 Comments
Re: Kill all cells with non-human genes?
We really do need to be careful about killing off ALL "non-human" cells. After all, as was pointed out above, we have symbiotic bacteria in our intestinal tracts, and I remember what happened in The Andromeda Strain.
Reply