|
Wednesday, September 06, 2006 Watching a Single Thought Form in the BrainNew techniques to capture single thought processes open up new possibilities for neuro-imaging. By Emily Singer
One of the long-term goals of the field of neuro-imaging is to understand what a person is thinking just by looking at the pattern of his or her brain activity--in essence, reading the mind. While that feat is still a long way off, scientists at the University of New Mexico have taken an important step by refining neuro-imaging techniques to the point where they can reliably detect a single thought forming in an individual's brain. The technique could be used to improve clinical applications of neuro-imaging, such as patient diagnosis, or to study cognitive processes that are fleeting or irreproducible, such as learning a new skill. "This could open up a whole new dimension of how fMRI could be used," says Peter Bandettini, director of the fMRI core facility at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, MD. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measures the amount of blood flow to different parts of the brain, thereby indicating which brain areas are most active. Imaging the brain while someone performs mental tasks, such as remembering words or doing math, gives insight into the parts of the brain crucial for these cognitive processes. But brain activity is very "noisy," meaning scientists must distinguish the relevant neural signals from background activity, which might come from a subject's breathing, moving, or even daydreaming. To detect brain activity associated with a specific task, then, most fMRI studies average brain scans from repeated tests in dozens of people. Stefan Posse and colleagues at the University of New Mexico are developing new ways to collect and analyze fMRI data that allow them to detect brain activity from a single thought. They've created their highly sensitive imaging methods by taking more pictures in a shorter amount of time and by developing new algorithms to integrate those images and to reduce background noise. As described in a paper last month in the journal Neuroimage, Posse's team asked eight volunteers lying in a scanner to think of a word beginning with a letter flashed on a screen above their faces. They then recorded the activity in Broca's area, a part of the brain involved in the generation of language. The researchers found they could detect activity in this region after a single trial about as reliably as in previous studies that averaged results over multiple trials. "We can actually see it on the scanner in real time," says Posse. Experts say the findings are promising, although they still need to be confirmed. "It's important to try this in other brain regions and with other tasks to see where it works," says Christopher deCharms, founder of Omneuron, a brain imaging startup in Menlo Park, CA.
|
Tryptophan, Turkey and Trust
11/21/2007



Comments
RedSevenOne on 09/06/2006 at 2:20 PM
18
Let us not forget that with all the ‘Promise’ that fMRI brings to the world of analysis, in the end it produces only impression, guides for diagnosis, and not Fact, particularly not Fact as defined by Evidence in a Court of Law.
Just as the DSM has been disallowed in Learned Jurisprudence, so too will inevitably be fMRI, if the protagonists are bold enough to try.
vanopelli on 09/06/2006 at 10:07 PM
1
IMAGination, full speed ahead. I'm sure that someday, perhaps not in court, this technology will be HUGE for new, beneficial medical applications.
aurizon on 09/07/2006 at 1:20 AM
2
It would also make a whiz bang lie detector or interrogation tool.
No torture needed, just ask 20 questions and home in on the answers
enantiomer2000 on 09/07/2006 at 1:22 AM
25
I do agree you that thought pattern recognition shouldn't be permissable in a court of law, just as the polygragh isn't.
catoosaflash on 09/07/2006 at 3:11 PM
10
deirdrebeth on 09/12/2006 at 12:34 PM
25
catoosaflash on 09/07/2006 at 3:10 PM
10
dpope2 on 09/22/2006 at 2:48 PM
1
Isn't it on the left side in most people?
d.pope
markhahn on 08/13/2007 at 12:34 PM
2
jgcirclec on 01/09/2008 at 4:52 PM
1
Is there an accurate measurement for the duration of single thought?
I am proposing this single thought approach for generating a "statement" as a grant project for next year and as an exhibit for an art museum in my community.
james see jamesgarvey.net