Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
« Back 1 2 3 4 [5]

March 2006

The Fountain of Health

Continued from page 4

By David Rotman

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Risk Factor
At Elixir and Sirtris, there is little talk about slowing down the aging process. Rather, both companies are intensely focused on the discovery and development of drugs for various age-related diseases, such as type 2 diabetes. Sirtris's Westphal puts it bluntly: "I was never interested in a company that would try to prolong life. I was interested in a company that was going to use genes involved in diseases of aging and in finding an FDA-approved path to get those drugs approved for important disorders like diabetes and neurological disorders."

Nevertheless, antiaging research and drug discovery efforts like Sirtris's and Elixir's are closely linked and share a common premise; a few master genes are thought to regulate both the body's ability to fight off diseases associated with aging and the extension of life span. Though it is still a controversial hypothesis, Sinclair and Guarente believe that in times of adversity or stress -- when food is scarce, for instance -- sirtuins somehow marshal an organism's natural defenses. They argue that, among other things, activated SIRT1 triggers changes in cells that mobilize repair mechanisms and increase energy production. It is, perhaps, these enhanced natural defense mechanisms that explain why animals on a calorie-restricted diet live longer and are healthier.

The idea that the genetic and molecular causes of aging and of many diseases are connected could provide a powerful new way of thinking about medicine, suggests Toren Finkel, a cardiologist at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in Bethesda, MD. Walk down the corridors of any hospital, he says, and you can't help but notice that many of the patients are elderly. "As cardiologists, we target what we view as causes of diseases -- clearly involved risk factors like hypertension." While that approach is effective, he says, it has largely ignored the most obvious factor in many diseases: age.

"It is obvious....We get sicker as we get older," says Finkel. He says he's not sure whether that observation "is so obvious it is stupid, or so obvious it is profound." But either way, he says, new research explaining the genetic and molecular events behind the aging process is, for the first time, raising the possibility of treating a broad range of diseases by intervening in that process. "No one had really thought about controlling aging as a practical way to control these diseases," says Finkel. "But it could be a powerful way of treating patients."

Our understanding of why people grow old is still primitive, but researchers say the drug discovery effort can push ahead regardless. "We don't understand a damn thing about aging," admits Helfand. But he's quick to add that the health benefits of calorie restriction are well documented in many organisms. And that, he says, "is very exciting from a drug discovery perspective."

The goal is clear: the discovery of drugs that will delay the onset of many of our most devastating diseases, the kind of illnesses that frequently turn the golden years into years of chronic ill health. "Everybody associates caloric restriction with longevity and life span, but the effects on diseases are much more immediate and important," says Guarente. "If only we understood how [calorie restriction] works, such knowledge would guide us in drug development. We would have a drug that would favorably impact many of the common diseases."

David Rotman is editor of Technology Review.

« Back 1 2 3 4 [5]
March/April 2006

Would you like to read more articles from the March/April 2006 issue?

This article is from the March/April 2006 Issue of Technology Review. To read other articles from this issue simply register for My.TechnologyReview.com. It's free.

Subscribe today and save up to 41% »

Comments

  • Metabolism and perception of time
    Guest (Jeremy Villalobos) on 03/23/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    One question that this article leave me asking, If you lower the metabolism of an organism, does that have an effect on how that organism perceives time?  If so, I guess I would not like to live longer if everything around me start to progress faster.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Sirtuin
    Guest (James R Hughes, MD) on 04/06/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Great write up.  There is also evidence the chemicals in the family of Resveritrol also increase SIR2 expression.  I think, at present, the best longevity regime for humans is every other day fasting (40% calorie restriction), exercising on fasting days (to promote lipolysis/gluconeogenesis pathways) and a good glass of red wine daily (high resveritrol content). I've been doing this over a year and feel better than I ever have and haven't got sick once.  There are many other pathways the fasting stimulates, and is doesn't make you "hungry all the time" like pure calorie restriction.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • The longer candle.
      Guest (Steve Koelzer) on 04/10/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Great article and comments.  As a lifetime (chemist) researcher I take great pleasure absorbing info.  Doing something other than appreciating knowledge requires keeping it in mind and retrieving it, so as to not falter or repeat mistakes.  To that end I figured out early that memory must take precedence.  Unfortunately drugs won’t work as well as natural methods, one of which is FOOD.  As information became available over decades, by adopting ortho-dietetic chemistry the value of managing free radicals became old hat.  As I focused on brain optimization it turned out that while preparing a 2005 Centigenarian address on dietarily enhancing IL-10 and minimizing IL-6 I discovered I had already adopted the two major factors.  I began taking selenium in 1973 and omega three oils in 1983. 
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Longer candle (ct'd).
        Guest (Steve Koelzer) on 04/10/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        Thus mentation and longevity go hand in hand.  Yes, rodents eating ad lib. semi-daily benefit as well or better than those calorie restricted.  Yes, taking antioxidants can help (a little) but first one should ensure getting the right amounts of each and every essential and indispensable nutrient.  As for resveratrol and flavonoids I have not moved to the purified sources yet but do chew dark grapes like a cud and go after Spanish sage and shallots, to name a few.  I avoid every foodstuff I’ve learned is not good and even breathed air slowly to filter it better.  I’m not yet 60 and my mind feels a teenager.  Hope this helps.  PS No alcohol for 20 years!
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Mitochondria
      Guest (Bill Jackson) on 05/04/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      We have heard comments that there are two mechanisms that seem to limit cellular longevity.
      One is the telomere length that is reduced bit by bit until the cell can no longer divide. Another is the gradual loss of the energy provisioning abilities of the mitochondria, which seem to act to limit cellular activity with advanced age.

      If one transplanted some intact mitochondria from a long lived species into a short lived one, what would happen? Would the organism last longer? I suggest this be done first on related species with well known but short disparate lifetimes so the effect, if any, would be seen quickly.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Mitochondria
        Guest (Diane Ritter) on 08/03/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        What an interesting idea.  I hope somebody picks up on this and tries it. 
        Rate this comment: 12345
  • curing disease vs. life-extension
    Guest (John Schloendorn) on 04/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    The summary of this article goes "Antiaging researchers aren’t likely to find ways to extend life anytime soon. But their work could provide a powerful approach to treating the many diseases of old age."

    I wonder how the author of this summary thinks a (presumably successful) treatment of age-related diseases can avoid resulting in life-extension... If we cure or postpone age-related diseases, i.e. things that kill us in old-age, then will we not almost by definition live longer?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: curing disease vs. life-extension
      rbarkley373 on 09/17/2007 at 2:36 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Yes and no. Curing diseases will increase the average lifespan (and could extend your life dramatically) but not have a significant effect on the maximum life span. It is increasing the maximum that is the goal of "life-extension".
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology