Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Thursday, February 16, 2006

Why Cancer Strikes Some

New ways to gauge an individual's response to environmental toxins will help scientists understand susceptibility to disease.

By Emily Singer

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

It's a conundrum that puzzles doctors and patients alike: one person smokes a few cigarettes per week in college and contracts lung cancer in middle age, while another person smokes a pack a day his whole life -- and lives to age 90.

A new program announced last week by the National Institutes of Health aims to unravel such mysteries by precisely measuring the role that environmental agents, such as pesticides and solvents, play in common diseases, including cancer, asthma, and autism.

A major part of the program will fund the development of technologies to monitor personal environmental exposures and to determine how those exposures interact with an individual's genetic makeup to increase the risk for disease. Scientists hope these technologies will allow doctors to determine who is at risk early on, and thus be able to intervene soon enough to prevent serious damage.

The NIH has designated $88 million for the period 2007-10 to fund research both inside and outside the institute. The money will go toward development of wearable sensors that measure exposure to environmental toxins, such as solvents, pesticides, and heavy metals.

The funds will also support the development of sensors to determine if exposure to toxins triggers biochemical pathways linked to disease, such as inflammation or cell death, in some individuals. Ultimately, these technologies will be incorporated into genetic studies to understand the link between genes, the environment, and disease.

Initially, the sensors would be used in population studies of disease. But David Schwartz, director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (part of the NIH), envisions a day when everyone would wear a sensor that measured levels of key chemicals. An individual's doctor could then read the information and determine if the patient had been exposed to chemicals and therefore was at risk of developing a disease.

The role of environmental toxins in human disease and death has been a major issue in both the public health and legal arenas. Scientists often have difficulty determining if a reported increase in disease, such as a cancer cluster, is linked to a specific factor in the environment. Emerging technologies that could accurately measure exposure and individual response to different chemicals could clarify these often contentious cases.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • carcinogens
    Guest (G. Anton Bosanque) on 02/16/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    I recently read about a study that was trying to determine why pancriatic cancer was so prevalent in the US and almost non-existant in India.  The came to the conclusion that it was because Indians eat more vegtables.  What they should have looked at is what chemicals Americans eat in their food and medicines.  I also read about a study that found that a common sweetner (in use for many years) would cause cancer in mice. The problem seemed to be that all the FDA studies sacrifice mice at two years, equivalant to 54 human years, but the cancers usually occur at a later age, so the majority of FDA studies (especially those funded by the substance producer), are invalid. I'm not saying that enviormental factors should not be studied, but I believe that food and drug carcinogens are much more prevalent     and important.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Belief vs. science
      Guest (Mark) on 03/02/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      "I believe that food and drug carcinogens are much more prevalent and important."

      Belief isn't science.  Where is the evidence?
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • How do we participate in Study?
    Guest (Clint Anderson) on 02/17/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Thanks,
    Clint
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • fsdfdgdf
    Guest (alicia) on 02/22/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    i love this story
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology