The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Stem-cell-based therapies could one day stop people with macular degeneration or other retinal diseases from losing their sight. (Source: Istockphoto.com/cgouin)
Scientists are designing stem-cell-based therapies for degenerative retinal diseases.
Scientists are taking the first major step in using stem cells to replace retinal cells lost to degenerative eye diseases such as macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa. According to findings published today, researchers at the University of Washington in Seattle can reliably make retinal cells from embryonic stem cells. The researchers are now implanting the cells into blind animals to see if the cells can restore vision.
"This work is the first step toward retinal reconstitution," says Stephen Rose, chief research officer at the Foundation Fighting Blindness, a nonprofit funding agency based in Owings Mills, MD.
The retina is a layer of cells lining the back of the eye that contains specialized neurons, known as photoreceptors, to convert light into electrical signals, as well as other neurons, known as retinal ganglion cells, to send those messages to the brain. In age-related macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa, the photoreceptors degenerate over time, leading to loss of vision.
"Those are the diseases we think can be targeted by stem cells," says Thomas Reh, a developmental biologist at the University of Washington who led the work. "If we can replace the photoreceptors, we think we can restore vision."
Scientists have been attempting to transplant eye cells for decades. While they have had some success in animal models using cells derived from fetuses or other sources, there has been little progress in humans, largely because of a lack of cells. "Finding a fountain source of cells you can effectively get out of bottle and squirt into someone's eye is really the way to go," says Raymond Lund, a retinal cell expert at the Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, OR.
Generating large numbers of retinal cells from embryonic stem cells could solve that problem. Achieving this feat with human cells has been difficult -- generating each type of tissue from stem cells requires its own special recipe, and some cell types are more difficult to make than others. Reh and his team used cues from normal eye development to find a unique mix of ingredients that trigger retinal cell development. The key, says Reh, is three proteins, called growth factors, known to be involved in head and eye development.
According to a paper published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the researchers can reliably generate retinal progenitor cells, which then have the ability to turn into any cell type in the retina, such as photoreceptors, retinal ganglion cells, or other cells. Preliminary results show that when the cells are transplanted into retinas either in a dish or in live animals, the cells migrate to different layers of the retina and begin to express proteins characteristic of the resident cells, including photoreceptors. The researchers are also developing ways to efficiently turn the progenitor cells into photoreceptors in a dish.
Guest (Jerry)
The multi-year delay in the progress of this science due to the President's blind eye and our congress's inability to agree to override is so unfortunate. . . .
Guest (kruelhunter)
Why do so many continue to claim that the President has banned embryonic stem cell research? And then they compound their error by pretending that only taxpayer funding can result in useful outcomes. If, as claimed by taxpayer funded researchers, embryonic stem cells are some sort of magic bullet don't they realize that private investors would flood the research facilities with all the funding they could use in hopes of big profits? Or is it that they find the idea of non government sponsored profit is somehow sinful? Or perhaps they like the idea of paying for the research that will make others rich so that they can then demand that government regulate yet another aspect of our lives?
Guest (Keith)
While stem cell research shows many promising new therapies that may relieve human suffering, research requiring the destruction of a developing human to harvest stem cells is frankensteinish. While i applaud research that focuses on transforming a potential patent's cell into a stem cells.
please note that the US federal ban on federal funding of fetal stem cell research does not place a ban on adult stem cell research.
Guest (Chris)
I agree that growing embyos for the sole purpose of medical research is not ethical. However, if there is a ready supply of unwanted embyos, why not put them to some good use instead of flushing them down the toilet? Is the embryo any less destroyed? Of course, I am referring to the thousands of unneeded embryos created from IVF treatments.
I have RP, and my wife and I also have frozen embryos from a successful IVF procedure. I would like to be able to designate an embryo or two for research but all I can legally do is tell the Medical Center to throw them away. What a waste of potential.
Guest (jonathan)
It is a terrible waste to throw away all of that potential for research that is right in front of us. Why, do you suppose, we dont see a big fuss about IVF? People who are opposed to the destruction of fertilized cells should be adamently opposed to IVF. I
imagine that the difference is that stem cell research is a newer technology that people arent accustomed to yet, as IVF has been around for many years. It is common to see this kind of reaction against new technology. We have seen it before in the past and we will see it many times in the future.
Guest (Brian)
there is opposition to IVF, but try to get any coverage of it. The deliberate production of "excess" embryoes has been a moral concern from the beginning. but objectors are conveniently written off as heartless, religious nuts.
Production of excess embryos is an ethical problem with IVF of its own that shouldn't be compounded with harvesting stem cells from the embryos.
When it comes down to it the big reasons for stem cell research is to use the technology to treat patents. Using a patent's own cells to make stem cells for treatments that use stem cells avoids tissue type matching as well as the ethics of destroying developing humans for research's name sake. if a society is to allow embryos to be grown for research how much of a stretch is it to let them grow an additional week, month, or years and harvest organs from clones.
As long as a society continues to treat fetuses as property and not human life with intrinsic rights then we are doomed to go down a path of continued devaluation of human life at all stages of development from fetus to grave. you might even find proponents that would support turning prison inmates into organ donors. HAY judge, we need more organs type B- blood type preferred.
Guest (Auburn13)
I am appalled at the indescribably stupid lack of compassion by a phoney compassionate conservative in denying the assistance of government scientists in the pursuit of alleviating human suffering by such afflictions as Maclar Degeneration by use of stem cells which are going to be destroyed anyway.
MY FRIENDS -WAKE UP!!!
Guest (kruelhunter)
Yet another magic bullet that can be supplied only by killing the yet-to-be-born.
Both my father and boyfriend suffer from eye diseases! My father has macular degeneration and my boyfriend has retinitis pigmentosa! If using embryos could cure them of these cruel diseases, then I am alllll for it! Embryos that would otherwise be thrown away could be of sight giving use! If I were a discardrd embryo, I'd be much happier knowing I was saving someone's eyesight, than just being thrown away and not being of any use at all! Life can give life!
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Guest (Jonathan)
tip of the eyesberg
Sorry about the bad puns.. I think it might be genetic. Stem cell therapies are certainly showing great promise...
Reply
Guest (Jonathan)
more
Once we can take any cells from a persons body and make individualized stem cells, I imagine things will really start cooking! Great progress in this area recently from a variety of sources..
check it out:
http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/003638.html
Reply
Guest (vision)
promise
part of the problem is that its been PROMISING for years and very little to show for it while other sources of stem cells have direct results
Reply
Guest (jonathan)
results
Yes, we have seen the promise of creating undifferentiated stem cells from adult cells for years, but only just recently have scientists uncovered the biochemical processes that make it possible. As far as I know, it is so new, human trials have only just begun.
Reply
gurby1
2 Comments
Re: tip of the eyesberg
I am interested to know how a blind mouse will be able to tell the researchers whether it can see with the new cells?
Reply