Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Big Brain Thinking

Stanford neuroscientist Bill Newsome wants to implant an electrode in his brain to better understand human consciousness.

By Emily Singer

Monday, February 13, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Scientists are learning volumes about the brain -- how it can make split-second decisions, how it learns from past mistakes, how it converts pulses of light into a complex visual scene. But, for some, deciphering the "language" of the electrical pulses that travel through our brains is only half the story. The second part, and one that is far more philosophical and complex, is how that brain activity translates into consciousness -- a person's self-awareness and perception of the world around them.

Bill Newsome, a neuroscientist at Stanford University in Palo Alto, CA, has spent the last twenty years studying how neurons encode information and how they use it to make decisions about the world. In the 1990s, he and collaborators were able to change the way a monkey responded to its environment by sending electric jolts to certain parts of its brain. The findings gave neuroscientists enormous insight into the inner workings of the brain.

But Newsome is obsessed with a lingering question: How does consciousness arise from brain function? He feels the best way to answer that question is by implanting an electrode into his own brain -- and seeing how the electric current changes his perception of the world.

Newsome would not be the first person with a brain implant. Epilepsy patients undergo electrical stimulation prior to brain surgery. A paralyzed man in New England has an experimental implant that translates his brain activity into movements of a robotic arm. And, perhaps most famously, Kevin Warwick, a cybernetics professor at the University of Reading, U.K., first implanted a chip into nerve fibers in his arm in 2002, then implanted a chip in his wife's arm, as part of his quest to become a cyborg.

It's not certain that Newsome will get approval for such a radical undertaking. But, if he does, his experiment won't be in the interest of curing a disease or become a human machine. He's hoping to do something broader: understand consciousness.

Technology Review: Why is understanding consciousness so important to you?

Bill Newsome: I think that how consciousness arises out of brain function is one of the most fascinating and important questions in all of neurobiology. If we understand the system completely (from input to output) at a cellular level, but still do not know exactly what causes conscious mental phenomena, we will have failed.

Comments

  • Emergency
    Try this: consciousness does not emerge from brain activity; brain activity emerges from consciousness.  An experiment such as the one described will likely produce ambiguous results, or will confirm the null hypothesis, depending on the bias of the experimenter/subject.  Separating the experimenter from the subject has its value, which should be more than enough reason to not do as described, quite apart from the risk of brain damage.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Bruce Cox)
    02/13/2006
    Posts:1
    • Big Brain Thinking
      Can't trans cranial magnetic stimulation induce current in specific neurons?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Hal Seyle)
      02/14/2006
      Posts:1
      • TMS is not specific enough
        TMS is not very localized, e.g. you can induce large temporary lesions
        in visual cortex but not more.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (A)
        02/15/2006
        Posts:1
    • Big Brain Thinking
      I think that consciousness emerges from brain activity AND brain activity arises from consciousness.

      I would love to be part of this research. I am very involved in learning about the brain since my TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) in 1973. I've come back further than just about anyone I've known with TBI (and as a Case Manager for a TBI research project and now as a vocational rehabilitation counselor who presently works with several people with TBI, I've met hundreds)
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (John Hatten)
      02/14/2006
      Posts:1
    • overlay and filter
      I do agree that physical brain activity is directed by our consciousness, but it is also quite true that physical conditions, let alone stimulus, can have quite an effect on consciousness.  What will be the true scientific problem is how to rigorously formulate experiments and extract data.  Time to get creative!
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (travis mattera)
      02/15/2006
      Posts:1
      • Consciousness before brain activity?
        How could this be?
        We can easily show that brain activity effects consciousness, but not the other way around.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Mike)
        02/15/2006
        Posts:1
        • A thought
          Not that I know anything about a human MT beyond what is said in the interview, but suppose his realization that and experience of his MT being stimulated causes his MT to explode.

          Brain activity being altered will have had an effect on coinscious activity, which subsequently had an adverse effect on brain activity. (which would then no doubt cause a serious counscious/personality shift and Bill Newsome would embark on a career change and become an artist.)
          Rate this comment: 12345
          Guest (MrMosis)
          02/15/2006
          Posts:1
        • Consciousness?
          Consciousness?  These people talk about it like it was some scientific fact.  What is consciousness??  How can you be searching for something when you don't know what "it" even is?  Decisions?  Who says we make decisions?  From instinct (emotion), you want to do one thing more than the other.  So, decisions and consciousness is simply the brain's ability to say "food is more important than being comfy", etc.  Why are people trying to overcomplicate things?  There is no ghost in the machine.
          Rate this comment: 12345
          Guest (Ben Shumway)
          02/15/2006
          Posts:1
          • Could be.
            You can't rule it out either.
            Rate this comment: 12345
            Guest (/e)
            02/15/2006
            Posts:1
            • can't rule out
              You can't rule it outtttttttt.
              http://maair.net
              http://mannan.zabvision.edu.pk
              Rate this comment: 12345
              Guest (Mannan)
              02/16/2006
              Posts:1
          • Outside our realm
            The problem with studying consciousness, is that it is our own consciousness that tries to study it. Now try to grab your right arm with your right arm.
            Rate this comment: 12345
            Guest (Gard)
            02/15/2006
            Posts:1
            • The simplest plausible solution
              Aren't we looking for the level of abstraction from stimulus to activity to consciousness? I don't believe they are separable but this kind of research may determine boundaries and even lead to breakthroughs in priorities. For example, the heartbeat is more important than breathing, breathing is more important than stopping bleeding and so on. It may be that shocking a brain will kill a person but a carefully applied stimulus may cause critical activity which could lead to the resumption of conscious thought. At least, that is how it would work in science fiction and is what shock paddles do with the heart.
              Rate this comment: 12345
              Guest (Derlin)
              02/16/2006
              Posts:1
          • consciousness
            conscsiosness is awareness of our own thought ,ablity ,behaviour .
            Rate this comment: 12345
            Guest (eranimos)
            05/02/2006
            Posts:1
            • [no subject]
              Also your bearings/whereabouts
              Rate this comment: 12345
              Guest
              07/10/2006
              Posts:1
        • Why Not - Encouraged to read on Kant
          How does an artist or philosopher creates art or notions completely original. We need to visit Kant and Clausewitz on coup de oeil or intution. A simple article is at chap 3 of the following link
          http://www.maxwell.af.mil/au/aul/aupress/SAAS_Theses/SAASS_Out/Pellegrini/pellegrini.pdf

          Cheers


          Rate this comment: 12345
          Guest (Gurbachan Singh)
          04/26/2006
          Posts:1
  • The stimulis is simply artificial data in
    By stimulating the MT he is only inputing false data to be interpreted by the consciousness. And to begin with he doesn't even know what data he inputs until his consciousness responds to it.

    I fail to see what he can learn beyond the effects of normal sensory input, except that he has fooled his consciousness with false data.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Sandi)
    02/20/2006
    Posts:1
    • Not just simulated stimulus
      The part of this that could shed some light on consciousness is the fact that it is not just simulating stimulus.  By bypassing certain parts of the normal flow of optical information you can start to see what parts of the brain contribute to conscious thought as opposed to unconcscious calculations.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Evan)
      02/21/2006
      Posts:1
      • interpreting false data is the whole point
        We can speculate that the  stimulation of the monkey MT does things to the monkey because of the monkeys response. 

        you can stimulate a monkey all day long, but at the end of the day the monkey's response is still just oooohhh aahha ahhh oohh.

        This guy will be able to describe the experience (assuming he doesn't accidentally damage his brain too much) of having his MT? stimulated.

        He knows the data is false, but will be able to still experience the sensation of the stimulation and describe with great detail what occurred.

        I think the fooling of the consciousness with false data is the whole point
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Nate)
        04/13/2006
        Posts:1
  • math
    hi fatty
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (chydgv)
    03/08/2006
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.